OMB COST ESTIMATE
FOR PAY-AS-YOU-GO CALCULATIONS
Report No: 503
Date:03/22/00
- LAW NUMBER: P.L.106-176 (H.R. 149)
- BILL TITLE: Omnibus Parks Technical Corrections Act
- BILL PURPOSE: Makes technical and minoramendments to the Omnibus Parks andPublic Lands Management Act of 1996 and other park and public land statutes.
- OMB ESTIMATE: Under the Recreation FeeDemonstration Program, the National ParkService (NPS) may collect and spend, without further appropriation, fees at 100 projects,including almost all of the parks collecting significant revenue. The remaining "non-demo" parksare still covered under the previous law that allows parks to retain and spendonly 15 percent of fees, with 85 percent deposited in a separate account and availablesubject to appropriation. P.L. 106-176 allows all NPS sites to retain and spend allreceipts. This authority expires when the Recreation Fee Demonstration Programauthority expires (currently the end of FY 2001). OMB estimates that this will increasespending by $6 million over the period 2000 through 2002.
- CBO ESTIMATE:
- EXPLANATION OF DIFFERENCES BETWEEN OMB AND CBO ESTIMATES:
- CUMULATIVE EFFECT OF DIRECT SPENDING AND REVENUE LEGISLATIONENACTED TO DATE:
| (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) | ||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| Net costs................. | 2 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) | ||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| Net costs................. | 3 | 6 | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
The difference between OMB and CBO estimates is the result of CBO's higher estimatesof baseline recreation fee receipts and different assumptions about how quickly spendingwill occur.
| (Fiscal years; in millions of dollars) | ||||||
| 2000 | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 | 2004 | 2005 | |
| Outlay effect.............. | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Receipt effect............ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Net costs.................... | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
Return to the OMB page
