November 25, 1998 The Honorable
Al Gore Dear Mr. President: The
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Section 251
(a) (7)), as amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997, requires that
OMB submit a report to Congress on appropriations legislation within seven
days of enactment. Section 252(d) requires that OMB submit a report to
Congress on direct spending or receipts legislation within seven days
of enactment. Enclosed are separate appropriations and pay-as-you-go reports
for Public Law 105-277, which became law on October 21, 1998. Jacob J.
Lew Enclosure
(82 kb) Identical
Letter Sent to The Honorable Newt Gingrich November
25, 1998 The Honorable
Newt Gingrich Dear Mr. Speaker: The
Balanced Budget and Emergency Deficit Control Act of 1985 (Section 251
(a) (7)), as amended by the Budget Enforcement Act of 1997, requires that
OMB submit a report to Congress on appropriations legislation within seven
days of enactment. Section 252(d) requires that OMB submit a report to
Congress on direct spending or receipts legislation within seven days
of enactment. Enclosed are separate appropriations and pay-as-you-go reports
for Public Law 105-277, which became law on October 21, 1998. Jacob J.
Lew Enclosure
(82 kb) Identical Letter Sent to The Honorable Al Gore NOTE: This
PAYGO report should proceed after table 12, page 39 of this 7-Day-After-Report)
OMB
COST ESTIMATE Report
No: 471
For the bill as a whole, OMB estimates a net pay-as-you-go cost of $250 million in 1999, and a net savings of $7.6 billion over five years. CBO estimates a net savings of $80 million in 1999, and a net cost of $25 million over five years. OMB estimates a net increase in outlays of $32 million in 1999 and $1.9 billion over five years. CBO estimates a net increase in outlays of $121 million in 1999, and $1.1 billion over five years. OMB estimates a net reduction in receipts of $181 million in 1999, and a net revenue gain of $9.6 billion over five years. CBO estimates a net revenue gain of $201 million in 1999, and $1.1 billion over five years. Of the five-year,
$8.5 billion receipts difference, the largest difference is due to the
provision restricting abusive liquidating REIT transactions. Over five
years, OMB estimates receipt increases of $15 billion from this provision,
while CBO estimates receipt increases of $5.6 billion. P.L. 105-277 required
that OMB score this provision using the economic and technical assumptions
used in preparing the FY 1999 Mid-Session Review (MSR) baseline receipts
forecast. The OMB MSR receipts baseline contained an explicit adjustment
for anticipated revenue losses associated with liquidating REIT transactions.
It is believed that CBO's estimate was made relative to a baseline that
did not fully capture the potential revenue erosion of these transactions.
Because of the baseline differences, OMB estimates that the provision
restricting liquidating REIT transactions raises significantly more revenue.
Partially
offsetting the estimating difference for the liquidating REIT provision
are differences in estimates for the extension of certain expiring tax
and trade provisions and provisions relating to farmers. OMB estimates
of the revenue loss for the tax and trade extensions and farming provisions
exceed CBO's estimates by $886 million and $675 million, respectively.
Technical modeling differences of the 1-year extension of a modified exception
from subpart F for active financing income and the provision of a special
5-year net operating loss carryback period for farming losses account
for most of the estimating differences. There are differences between OMB and CBO scoring of the provisions affecting Medicare, veterans compensation, and TVA debt refinancing. For the Medicare provisions, CBO estimates $150 million in outlays in 1999 and $800 million over five years. OMB estimates 1999 outlays of $20 million, and five-year outlays of $710 million. In 2000, OMB estimates outlays of $510 million, while CBO estimates outlays of $2.0 billion. In 2001, OMB estimates outlays $480 million, while CBO estimates outlay savings of $1.1 billion. CBO's baseline assumes higher Medicare spending, and this accounts for the large differences in the home health estimates in 2000 and 2001. For veterans compensation, OMB and CBO differ in their assumptions of veterans behavior and how quickly the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) will implement the provision affecting benefits for Gulf War veterans. Based on experience with Agent Orange legislation, OMB assumes VA will process and grant more claims than CBO does. OMB estimates outlays of $502 million from 2001-2003, while CBO estimates outlays of $40 million over the same three years. For the TVA debt repayment provision, OMB assumes lower long-term interest rates and thus a higher market value for TVA's debt than does CBO. OMB estimates outlays of $94 million in 1999, and $690 million over five years. CBO estimates outlays of $16 million in 1999, and $306 million over five years.
|