MEMORANDUM
FOR AGENCY CHIEF INFORMATION OFFICERS
FROM: |
Donald
Arbuckle /s/ |
|
|
SUBJECT: |
Biennial
Privacy Act and Computer Matching Reports |
Contents
of Memorandum:
Every two years
the President is required to submit to the Speaker of the House
and the President pro tempore of the Senate a report describing
the exercise of individual rights of access and amendment under
the Privacy Act and consolidating information regarding computer
matching activities of federal agencies. OMB Circular A-130 (Appendix
I) directs agencies to submit information necessary to these reports
by June 30 in even numbered years. This memorandum is to remind
you that the report is due and provide instructions as to how to
report.
Please note
that on May 14, 1998, the President signed a memorandum directing
agencies to undertake a review of their systems of records, routine
uses, and practices regarding sharing of personal information with
State, local and tribal governments. You will be receiving separate
instructions for responding to the President's memorandum very soon.
We are working with agency Privacy Act officers to avoid duplication
of effort between the statutory biennial Privacy Act Report and
reporting under the President's memorandum.
Attached are
specific instructions on the biennial Privacy Act Report along with
a list of the existing matching programs which will be helpful to
agencies reporting computer matching activities. (If you are receiving
this document electronically, the list of matching agreements is
attached as an HTML document.) The list of matching agreements can
also be found on the CIO homepage at http://www.cio.gov.
The instructions
are largely the same as those for the 1994-1995 report. The only
changes are the request for electronic mail addresses for agency
contacts and more specific instructions about how to identify computer
matching programs.
Your response
is due by June 30, 1998.
Please address
all paper submissions to the Acting Administrator of OIRA at the
address listed in the attached instructions and send an electronic
copy of your submission to Oleinick@omb.eop.gov.
If you have
questions about the report, please contact Lew Oleinick, at 202/395-4638
(voice); 202/395-5167 (facsimile); or via electronic mail at Oleinick@omb.eop.gov.
Contents
of the Biennial Privacy Act Report:
Top of Page
-
Name and
postal address of reporting agency.
-
Name, telephone
number, and electronic mail address(1)
of agency official who can best answer questions about this
report.
-
Name, postal
address, and electronic mail address of the senior official
responsible for agency's Privacy Act implementation.
-
Name, postal
address, electronic mail address, and telephone number of agency
Privacy Act Officer.
-
Systems
of records inventory for the period January 1, 1996 through
December 31, 1997 . (please consult your last report and ensure
that the numbers reported there are consistent with those you
report below). Provide the requested data in the form of the
table presented below. If any of the cells in the table below
are not applicable please indicate such by placing an "N/A"
in the correct cell.
Item
# |
Description |
1996 |
1997 |
1 |
Total
number of nonexempt systems of records |
|
|
2 |
Total
number of exempt systems of records |
|
|
3 |
Number
of new nonexempt systems of records added |
|
|
4 |
Number
of new exempt systems of records added |
|
|
5 |
Number
of routine uses added |
|
|
6 |
Number
of exemptions added to existing systems |
|
|
7 |
Number
of exemptions deleted from existing systems |
|
|
8 |
Total
number of automated systems of records (exempt/nonexempt) |
|
|
- A
brief narrative describing additions of exemptions, routine uses,
or systems of records.
For example,
''the Department added a (k)(1) exemption to an existing system
of records entitled ''Investigative Records of the Office of Investigations;''
or ''the agency added a new routine use to a system of records entitled
'Employee Health Records' that would permit disclosure of health
data to researchers under contract to the agency to perform workplace
risk analysis.''
-
A brief
description of any public comments received on agency Privacy
Act publication and implementation activities, and agency response.
-
Number
of access and amendment requests from record subjects citing
the Privacy Act that were received, and the disposition
of requests from any year that were completed, between January
1, 1996 and December 31, 1997. Provide the requested data in
the form of the table presented below. any of the cells in the
table below are not applicable please indicate such by placing
an "N/A" in the correct cell.
NOTE:
If the number of access requests which cite the Privacy Act have
decreased or increased significantly from an earlier year, then
provide a brief description of the factors responsible for this
increase or decrease.
Item
# |
Description |
1996 |
1997 |
|
Access
Requests |
|
|
1 |
Total
number of requests for access(2) |
|
|
2 |
Number
granted in whole |
|
|
3 |
Number
granted in part |
|
|
4 |
Number
wholly denied |
|
|
5 |
Number
for which no record was found |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amendment
Requests |
|
|
6 |
Total
number of requests to amend records in the system |
|
|
7 |
Number
granted in whole |
|
|
8 |
Number
granted in part |
|
|
9 |
Number
wholly denied(3) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appeals
of Denials of Access |
|
|
10 |
Total
number of appeals of denials of access |
|
|
11 |
Number
granted in whole(4) |
|
|
12 |
Number
granted in part |
|
|
13 |
Number
wholly denied(5) |
|
|
14 |
Number
for which no record was found |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Appeals
of Denials of Amendment |
|
|
15 |
Total
Number of Appeals of Denials of Amendment |
|
|
16 |
Number
granted in whole(6) |
|
|
17 |
Number
granted in part |
|
|
18 |
Number
wholly denied(7) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
-
Number
of instances in which individuals brought suit under section
(g) of the Privacy Act against the agency and the results of
any such litigation that resulted in a change to agency policies
or practices.
- Description
of the results of reviews undertaken in response to the
following(8):
(1) Section
(m) Contracts. Review a random sample of agency contracts that
provide for the maintenance of a system of records on behalf
of the agency to accomplish an agency function, in order to
ensure that the wording of each contract makes the provisions
of the Act binding on the contractor and his or her employees.
(See 5 U.S.C. 552a(m)(1))
(2) Record
keeping Practices. Review agency Record keeping and disposal
policies and practices in order to assure compliance with the
Act, paying particular attention to the maintenance of automated
records.
(3) Routine
Use Disclosures. Review the routine use disclosures associated
with each system of records in order to ensure that the recipient's
use of such records continues to be compatible with the purpose
for which the disclosing agency collected the information.(9)
(4) Exemption
of Systems of Records. Review each system of records for which
the agency has promulgated exemption rules pursuant to Section
(j) or (k) of the Act in order to determine whether such exemption
is still needed.(10)
(5) Systems
of Records Notices. Review each system of records notice to
ensure that it accurately describes the system of records. Where
minor changes are needed, e.g., the name of the system manager,
ensure that an amended notice is published in the Federal Register.
- A
description of agency Privacy Act training practices.
Submit the
report to:
Acting Administrator,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
Office of Management and Budget
ATTN: Docket Library
NEOB Room 10012
Washington, D.C. 20503.
Write "Biennial
Privacy Act Report" on the envelope in which the report is submitted.
And to
oleinick@omb.eop.gov
Write "Biennial
Privacy Act Report for [agency]" on the subject line, filling in
the name of your agency.
Contents
of the Biennial Computer Matching Report
Top of Page
-
A listing
of the names and positions of the members of the Data Integrity
Board. Show separately the name of the Board Secretary, his
or her postal address, electronic mail address, and telephone
number. Show and explain any changes in membership or structure
occurring during the reporting year.
-
A listing
of each matching program, by title and purpose, in which the
agency participated during any portion of the reporting
year. This listing should show names of participant agencies,
give a brief description of the program, and give a page citation
and the date of the Federal Register notice describing the program.
Use
the attached copy of the Biennial Computer Matching Report of 1994/1995,
as a template for your listing of matching programs. If a match
from the 1994/1995 report is ongoing, specify the matching program
number assigned by OMB listed in the table of the attached report.
Provide the Federal Register notice citation for "renewed" matches
which extended beyond the 18 month + 12 month renewal period.
For
example:
Upon
examination of Table 1, one sees that the Department of Defense
had 34 matching programs in effect during the period covered by
the last Computer Matching Report (1994 and 1995).The illustration
below is a representative entry from the computer matching table
which is attached.
Table
1. Example of Computer Matching Report Table (Top
of Page)
REPORTING
AGENCY
|
TITLE
OF
MATCH
|
MATCHING
AGENCY
|
PURPOSE
|
PUBLICATION
DATE
|
FEDERAL
REGISTER
NOTICE
|
Department
of Defense
4
|
Retired
Military |
Office
of Personnel Management |
To
identify individuals who are improperly receiving miliary
retired pay and (1) credit for military service in their civil
service annuities, or (2) annuities based on the "guarantee
minimum" disability formula. Match identifies and/or prevents
erroneous payments under the CSRA, FERSA and Joint Uniform
Military Retired Pay System. |
09/28/90
re-issued
12/13/94
|
55
FR 39686
re-issued
58
FR 64196
|
The
entry in the table indicates that this particular matching program
was last initiated through publication in the Federal Register
on December 31, 1994. If this particular matching program continued
beyond June, 30, 1997, then the Department would have been required
to publish another notice.
For
the 1996-1997 report, the Department of Defense table entry submitted
to OMB should appear like the illustration below. Agencies should
reference the OMB match number in the first column. The OMB match
number is the number listed in the first column of the attached
table (also available via the secure portion of the CIO Council
Homepage). The match listed in the example above was assigned OMB
Match Number 4. The OMB Match Number will be used to ensure continuity
and consistency, i.e., so that OMB and the agency involved will
have a common reference number when discussing a match. The illustration
below in Table 2 shows what the example entry would look like in
the 1996-1997 report to OMB.
Table
2. Example of Renewed Matching Program Report (Top
of Page)
REPORTING
AGENCY
|
TITLE
OF MATCH
|
MATCHING
AGENCY
|
PURPOSE
|
PUBLICATION
DATE
|
FEDERAL
REGISTER NOTICE
|
Department
of Defense
4
OMB
Match Number 4
|
Retired
Military |
Office
of Personnel Management |
To
identify individuals who are improperly receiving miliary retired
pay and (1) credit for military service in their civil service
annuities, or (2) annuities based on the "guarantee minimum"
disability formula. Match identifies and/or prevents erroneous
payments under the CSRA, FERSA and Joint Uniform Military Retired
Pay System. |
09/28/90
re-issued
12/13/94
Re-published
DD/MM/YYYY
|
55
FR 39686
re-issued
58 FR
64196
Re-published
##
FR ####
|
Note
: DD/MM/YYYY would be filled in with the correct date as would the
volume and page number in the Federal Register citation. Use four
digit years, e.g., 1994.
-
For each
matching program, an indication of whether the cost/benefit
analysis performed resulted in a favorable ratio. The Data Integrity
Board should explain why the agency proceeded with any matching
program for which an unfavorable ratio was reached.
-
For each
program for which the Board waived a cost/benefit analysis,
the reasons for the waiver and the results of the match, if
tabulated.
-
A description
of any matching agreement the Board rejected and an explanation
of the rejection.
-
A listing
of any violations of matching agreements that have been alleged
or identified, and a discussion of any action taken.
-
A discussion
of any litigation involving the agency's participation in any
matching program.
-
For any
litigation based on allegations of inaccurate records, an explanation
of the steps the agency used to ensure the integrity of its
data and the verification process it used in the matching program,
including an assessment of the adequacy of each.
Submit the
report to:
Acting Administrator,
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
Office of Management and Budget
ATTN: Docket Library
NEOB Room 10012
Washington, D.C. 20503
Write "Biennial
Computer Matching Report" on the envelope in which the report is
submitted.
And electronically
to: oleinick@omb.eop.gov
Write "Biennial
Computer Matching Report for " on the subject line,
filling in the name of your agency.
-
Provide
electronic mail addresses for each individual in the report
when available.
-
If a request
from a record subject cites the Privacy Act then it should be
considered an "access request" for this table.
-
Where
a request for amendment is wholly denied and no modification
to the record is made.
-
Where
the appeal is granted and access to the record is provided.
-
Where the
appeal is not granted and access to the record is denied again.
-
Where the
appeal is granted and the record is amended.
-
Where the
appeal is not granted and the request to amend the record is
denied again.
-
OMB Circular
A-130, Appendix I, 4.a(5) and 3.a(1)-(4), (8), 61 Fed. Reg.
6428, Feb. 20, 1996.
-
Since Circular
A-130 requires agencies to conduct such a review every four
years, if no report was made in the last agency Privacy Act
report, then the results of such a review must be provided in
this report.
- Since Circular
A-130 requires agencies to conduct such a review every four years,
if no report was made in the last agency Privacy Act report, then
the results of such a review must be provided in this report.
|