1.
|
A total of thirty-seven determinations were made not to comply with requests for
records, or to redact portions of records, under the number 5 U.S.C. §552(a).
It should be noted that in a single responsive document several exemptions may
have been cited.
|
|
|
Reason
|
Number of Times
|
(a)
|
Agency had no records responsive
|
23
|
(b)
|
Agency-to-agency requests are not provided for under the Freedom of
Information Act
|
0
|
(c)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (2)
|
2
|
(d)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (4)
|
5
|
(e)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (5)
|
4
|
(f)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (6)
|
3
|
|
2.
|
Three appeals were made under Subsection 552 (a) (6). Responses to two of
the appeals confirmed that the agency had no records responsive to the request.
In response to one appeal, it was determined that the information was no longer
deliberative, therefore, some of the records originally withheld were
released.
|
3.
|
Participating individuals cited in all letters of denial, and the number of
instances of participation for each:
|
|
Carol Ehrlich
Freedom of Information Act Officer
|
37
|
4.
|
The results of proceedings conducted pursuant to Subsection (a) (4) (F) against the
officer or employee who was primarily responsible for improperly withholding
records were not applicable to the agency.
|
5-7.
|
A copy of the Office of Administration's fee schedule, fee waiver policy and
miscellaneous fee provisions under 5 CFR §§ 2502.11-15
are attached.
|
|
(a) The Office of Administration collected $383.30 in 1997 for making records
available.
|
|
|
|