1.
|
A total of fifty-two determinations were made not to comply with requests for
records, or to redact portions of records, under the number 5 U.S.C. §552(a).
It should be noted that in a single responsive document several exemptions may
have been cited.
|
|
|
Reason
|
Number of Times
|
(a)
|
Agency had no records responsive
|
22
|
(b)
|
Agency-to-agency requests are not provided for under the Freedom of
Information Act
|
0
|
(c)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (2)
|
7
|
(d)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (4)
|
18
|
(e)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (5)
|
2
|
(f)
|
Denied in whole or in part under 5 U.S.C. §552 (b) (6)
|
3
|
|
2.
|
One appeal was made under Subsection 552 (a) (6). Response to the
appeal confirmed that the agency had no records responsive to the
request.
|
3.
|
Participating individuals cited in all letters of denial, and the number
of instances of participation for each:
|
|
Carol Ehrlich
Freedom of Information Act Officer
|
21
|
4.
|
The results of proceedings conducted pursuant to Subsection (a) (4) (F) against
the officer or employee who was primarily responsible for improperly withholding
records were not applicable to the agency.
|
5-7.
|
A copy of the Office of Administration's fee schedule, fee waiver policy and
miscellaneous fee provisions under 5 CFR §§ 2502.11-15
are attached.
|
|
(a) The Office of Administration collected $1,089.51 in 1996 for making
records available.
|
|
|
|