For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
May 8, 2005
Press Briefing by National Security Advisor Stephen Hadley on the President's Meeting with President Putin
Rossiya Filing Center
12:24 A.M. (Local)
MR. HADLEY: The events of the evening have concluded. As Dr.
Rice said, the evening kind of confirmed the excellent relationship
between these two men. The conversations were cordial, extensive,
light-hearted at times, conducted in a very good atmosphere.
The two leaders had a private meeting, just the two of them plus
translators. It went about 40 minutes. They discussed mostly -- a
little bit about the Baltics and Georgia, talked a little bit about the
President's speech that he gave in Latvia. There was then a press
event, which you all saw. There was then a 45-minute extended meeting
with Dr. Rice and myself on our side, and Foreign Minister Lavrov and
National Security Advisor Igor Ivanov on their side joining with the
two Presidents and the translators. And then there was a dinner
tonight between the two couples. It was supposed to go an hour and 10
minutes; it went over two hours, involved dinner and also some --
seeing some of the facilities on the compound.
Dr. Rice talked a little bit about the discussions. Let me add
just a little bit. President Putin, of course, has recently been to
the Middle East, so he debriefed a little bit his trip; he'd met with
Prime Minister Sharon, Prime Minister Abbas and other leaders. Then
they talked a little bit about practical next steps for advancing the
process of peace in the Middle East. They agreed on the need,
obviously, to support Prime Minister Abbas, to support Prime Minister
Sharon in his disengagement effort, and they talked specifically about
the need for concrete steps to help the Palestinian Authority to fight
terror, the importance of continuing the fight against terror in the
There was a little discussion about Iran, and the President
acknowledged the support that Russia had given in the process of trying
to push Iran to the point where it would give up its nuclear
aspirations, and particularly the two men indicated their mutual
support for the negotiations being conducted by the EU-3. They also --
the President complimented President Putin on his state of the state
speech here a week to 10 days ago, that talked extensively about
democracy in Russia. And they also talked about U.N. reform, exchanged
some ideas on where those proposals stand, and the two leaders agreed
that the two countries needed, through their appropriate officials, to
be in close discussion about U.N. reform as that process goes forward.
They also talked about the WTO and potential Russia accession to
the WTO, and the ongoing negotiations between the United States and
Russia on this subject. They affirmed the need for process. They each
expressed confidence in each other's negotiators, Minister Gref and Rob
Portman, and agreed that these two folks need to meet soon to try and
get further progress towards a WTO agreement.
That's really the gist of what they talked about. I'd be glad to
answer any questions.
Q Steve, can I start over here by asking you -- the Russian
President has expressed this week a sentiment that he feels like the
U.S. is lecturing Russia about democracy. So, in that vein, what was
his response to the President's speech yesterday in Riga, which was
rather pointed on that subject?
MR. HADLEY: You -- the press has characterized it as lecturing.
We certainly don't characterize it as lecturing. And in the
conversations I was in, neither did President Putin. The President did
talk to President Putin about the visit in Latvia, and talked about his
speech. And I think the views expressed by the Russian side, not only
President Putin but other officials, is that there was some things that
they liked about it, some things that they had less -- sort of more
questions about, but, in balance, I think their judgment is that it was
a balanced speech, with some real positive elements.
Q Since Mr. Putin said yesterday that -- he seemed to correct
the President by saying we were not aggressors, we were liberators.
Did that come up? I mean, that's quite a -- it's not a press's
characterization, it's Putin's characterization.
MR. HADLEY: That's different than David's point. In the
discussions I was in, that did not come up. Obviously, I think it's
fair to say the Russians see the history a little bit differently,
perhaps, than we do, but the history that the President described in
his speech in Latvia, there's really nothing new on the U.S. side.
That's the same view we've had, that it was a forced incorporation of
the Baltic states into the Soviet Union. That's been our position for
-- since 1918*, when we refused to recognize it, and kept the embassies
open in Washington, D.C. So people may have forgotten that history,
but it's not a new position on behalf of the United States.
Q Did the President specifically talk to President Putin
about the fact that perhaps the U.S. feels that he's either
intimidating his neighbors, or that he's not allowing democracies or
supporting democracies to flourish, in Latvia, for example, like he
said he would, and what was President Putin's response?
MR. HADLEY: He has, as you know, right along raised the issue of
the relationship between Russia and its neighbors. One of the things,
of course, he said in the speech he made in Riga, that he thought
Russia had nothing to fear with democracies on its border, that, in
fact, that is a good thing for Russia, because as he says, democratic
states are peaceful states and generally want good relations with their
neighbors. So that's the context in which the issue arise. Obviously,
like any neighboring states, there are issues -- borders and other
things. And the President has encouraged, really, both sides to try
and resolve those issues in a peaceful and businesslike way.
Q Can you characterize the discussions, though, tonight on
that issue between President Bush and President Putin?
MR. HADLEY: I wasn't in that discussion, as I say. That occurred
in the private session. My sense from the President, it was a very
straightforward conversation, as I described.
Q You say, he complimented President Putin on his recent
speech. Could you elaborate a little bit? What did he find that he
liked about it?
MR. HADLEY: Well, of course, I think the main thing was that the
speech was focused on democracy, and Putin's description of the
progress they are making in democracy and a recommitment to a
democratic process and a democratic evolution. There were some
references in that speech, as you know, to the press. There was
references to civil society. And I think that was really -- the
President was impressed by the focus and the time that was spent in a
state of the state address to talk really about democracy in Russia.
It is an important subject and it indicates that Putin thought it was
an important subject, and a number of things he said in it were
Q So since the Bratislava meeting, when it seemed -- we felt
that there was a tense atmosphere, you feel like progress has been
made, or that this speech was an indication that Russia is moving
forward toward what the President would like to see?
MR. HADLEY: Look, I think it's an indication that there's been a
good dialogue between the two countries. On the issue of democracy --
and it's not just democracy in Russia, of course. The President, as
you know, is putting forward a freedom agenda more broadly. His goal
is to end tyranny in the world. And one of the messages he has tried
to bring to both the meeting in Latvia, the meeting here, and will in
Georgia, as well, that, you know, let's -- yes, this is a celebration
of history, but it's also a time to put the history behind us, to
recognize it is a new Europe that has emerged out of the end of World
War II and the fall of communism. It is a Europe that is now committed
to democracy and freedom and human rights and these values.
And the job for all of us now is to work together, looking forward,
to consolidate freedom and democracy in Europe and in the individual
countries in Europe -- to consolidate it in Europe, and then for Europe
and the United States to advance those values and principles in the
rest of the world, certainly in the broader Middle East, but more
generally, as well.
So I think the President thinks it's time to focus going forward on
the opportunity we have to advance those values, not only in Europe,
but beyond Europe, as well.
Q Could you describe any discussion on Iraq? And was there
any talk about President Putin's comments -- or the concept that you
can't export democracy?
MR. HADLEY: Well, the President addressed that in his Latvia
address, where he noted that President Putin had talked about his
interest -- Russia's interests were closer ties with the West, and the
President said he agreed with that, and also that -- and I can't quote
it exactly, but that democracy couldn't be imposed, it has to come out
of a particular culture and society. And the President said in his
speech, I agree with that, too, because we've said that democracy
cannot be imposed, it has to be chosen, as the President said. And
it's a struggle, it's a process. And countries really need to go down
that process themselves. We can help, but in the end of the day, it
has to be a homegrown process that results in democratic institutions
that incorporate these values, but in ways that reflect the history and
culture and experience of individual countries. I don't think there's
any disagreement about that between the two.
Q In the context of Iraq, was there --
MR. HADLEY: There wasn't an extensive discussion. I mean, the
President noted the progress that is made today, that it looks like
there now is a full cabinet that has been approved by the legislature;
that that is obviously progress. It was a pretty -- not a major area
of focus in the conversations.
Q Steve, you talk about how the U.S. -- the Baltics position
is not new, and that's true. But the President doesn't very often beat
Russia about the head with it so publicly, like he has over the last
several days. So in that context, what was the President trying to
accomplish tonight as they came together face-to-face?
MR. HADLEY: Again, I don't accept the characterization, beat them
over the head with it. The problem -- the reality, of course, is this
is an event tomorrow on the end of World War II, which put this history
back in the forefront of the public mind and provoked a debate about
that history. And obviously, one of the things that the President
wanted to do in this trip, and in the range of stops, is to have a full
treatment of the history. There was World War II; that the Russians
deserve a huge amount of credit for the defeat of fascism in Europe and
making enormous sacrifices -- over 28 million people killed -- showing
great courage; and to salute that, as well as the courage expressed by
and manifested by our own citizens and others in the coalition --
that's why, of course, the stop in The Netherlands -- but to make the
point that some we're liberated by the end of World War II, not all,
that the liberation of the rest has occurred really with the fall of
communism; that's a good thing. And that, of course, is going to be a
theme that he did in the Baltics and will do again in Geogia -- that
now there's an opportunity to put history -- or to move -- without
discounting the history, to move beyond the history, since we do have
these shared values. And that requires the hard work of democratic
states. And part of that work in democratic states is not only
sovereignty and majority rule, but taking care of minorities and making
sure that they have adequate rights and are included in society.
And that's a theme he's given to the Latvians, where they deal with
their minorities; it is a theme that he will take to Georgia as it
deals with its minorities. And so the bottom line, I think, is the
President wants to celebrate and acknowledge the sacrifice that has
resulted in a situation where Europe is whole, free and at peace,
sharing these values and principles, and then say, let's now look
forward about consolidating these principles in Europe, and taking them
and advancing them in the world.
So it's -- you've got to look, I think, at the trip as a whole,
which focuses on this history because of the event that's going to be
out here tomorrow.
Q That was actually my question, is how did tonight's --
that's actually exactly my question, is how did tonight's face-to-face
meeting fit into that whole? What was Bush trying to accomplish by
sitting down with Putin, and maybe not getting into all the specific
grievances of this and that? What was he trying to accomplish?
MR. HADLEY: One of the things I think he was trying to accomplish
was, one -- really two things. One, there's a lot more to our
relationship with Russia than just this discussion, of course, so
there's an opportunity for the two men to talk about Iran and the
Middle East and all these other things which we talked about, which
reminds us all that the agenda with Russia is a broad one. We do have
a lot of common interests, areas where we need to work together to
achieve common interests and common values. And at the same time, of
course, the issue about the democracy and freedom agenda is at the
center of the President's foreign policy, and he obviously wants
Putin's support in that endeavor.
So I think it's just another opportunity to continue these themes,
and probably to do a little bit of explanation, and make sure that
President Putin understood the message the President was sending in the
Balt and the message that the President will be conveying in Georgia.
Q Did the words "Molotov-Ribbentrov" actually come up? Did
the President actually make any requests of the President -- President
Putin to do anything, or was the answer already clear before he walked
in, so he didn't raise the issue?
MR. HADLEY: I think that issue and the history has been pretty
well discussed over the last several days. It came up in the press
backgrounder before we went on this trip; it's been in the press. I
think the history has been pretty well discussed here in the run-up to
this event tomorrow. And again, the President felt the time was really
now to, as I said, start shifting and mapping out the way forward. And
I think that was much more the focus of things tonight.
Q He didn't raise it?
MR. HADLEY: Say again?
Q He did not, then, raise it? He felt like it had already
been dealt with?
MR. HADLEY: Not in the discussions I was in. But, of course,
there was the 45-minute private meeting, and I wasn't in the debrief of
that; I can't tell you that it didn't come up. But his focus really
is, without denigrating in any way the history, trying to focus, as I
said, on moving forward and the opportunity we have to advance freedom
Q I have two questions. Did President Putin bring up the
President's travel, his itinerary? Did he complain about his trips to
Latvia and to Georgia, like Foreign Minister Lavrov did in the letter?
MR. HADLEY: No.
Q Not a word?
MR. HADLEY: Not in any of the discussions that I was in. You
know, this is -- the letter that people talk about with Foreign
Minister Lavrov was -- you tell me -- six weeks ago. I mean, it was
about the time we announced the trip. And it wasn't a particularly big
deal at the time and I think that's old news, and has been for weeks.
Q But you -- a certain senior administration official told me
that you were expecting that Putin would bring this up; that he would
complain about the travel plans of the President. And that never
MR. HADLEY: I didn't expect he would complain about it. It didn't
come from me.
Q You heard none of it from the meetings you were in?
MR. HADLEY: No, I did not. Now, I said there was a private
meeting where they discussed the Baltics and Georgia. I think it was
much more to make sure that Putin understood the message that the
President made in his speech in Latvia and would be making in Georgia.
Q How much did time did they spend on North Korea? And what
did they say about it?
MR. HADLEY: There was a brief discussion about North Korea and a
sort of rendering about what the North Koreans have said, about
bilateral discussions and the like, and a reaffirmation by the
President, of course, the importance of the six-party talks and the
North Koreans returning to the six-party talks to discuss giving up the
nuclear weapons. It wasn't a -- their nuclear programs -- there wasn't
any new ground that was particularly broken on that issue.
Q -- about what to do if North Korea tests a nuclear weapon?
MR. HADLEY: There wasn't any discussion about that.
Q Two questions. Did President Putin raise the question of
Belarus that was raised by President Bush in his speech? And secondly,
you said President Bush would like Mr. Putin's support for his
democracy and freedom agenda. Do you get a sense he has it?
MR. HADLEY: First, Belarus not in the discussions that I have --
that I was in. And secondly, in terms of the freedom agenda, I would
say, yes, and I would point to you the fact that Russia is one of the
members of the Quartet that is focusing on the advance of progress in
the Middle East and, of course, the core of our approach to that is the
need for a democratic Palestinian state. And that is an enterprise
that the Quartet is going to be very involved in. Jim Wolfensohn, as
you know, who is going to work on that aspect with the Palestinians, is
actually going to do it under the auspices of the Quartet.
The Russians have been increasingly supportive about the effort
we're making in Iraq and the elections there and the formation of
government there. So I think, yes. And I would also say that -- I'd
go back to Putin's speech here 10 days ago where he talks about the
importance of democracy in Russia. So I think, yes, they're on board
with that agenda.
Q Did the President and Mr. Putin talk about enlarging --
enlargement of the Security Council of the United Nations? Did Mr.
Putin propose German to get in --
MR. HADLEY: No, there was no proposal. There was a discussion of
the issue of the enlargement of the Security Council. And it was noted
that our position has been the only country we have come out in support
of joining the Security Council has been Japan. It was noted that
President Putin had made some public comments about Germany. But I
think there was a recognition that both parties have some -- both the
United States and Russia have some work to do in defining their own
thinking about how to approach U.N. Security Council reform, and a
commitment that the two countries needed to be in conversation with
each other and sharing views on that subject; that it's an important
one, and that really both sides have some work to do, and an agreement
that would probably be useful to do that -- some of that working and
Q On the Iran issue, how hopeful is the President that
EU-Iran talks will succeed? And if it doesn't, is the President
willing to ask Russian help to get Iranian case to Security Council?
MR. HADLEY: Well, we, of course, are hopeful. We've tried to
support the EU-3 Iran discussions with some of the things that were
done right after the President returned from Europe. We've been
skeptical all along as to whether it would work. That doesn't mean
that we aren't hopeful, and that we don't support it. But, obviously,
some skepticism is in order. As you may remember, one of the things
that is in the letter of the EU-3 foreign ministers that went to the
rest of the EU was a recognition that if those negotiations break down,
or if the current suspension is lifted, that it would be a matter for
the Security Council. And that's well-known. And I think we would
hope that Russia would be supportive of that effort. But, again,
that's a hypothetical at this point.
As a general matter, the Russians have been very supportive of the
effort -- both supportive of what the EU-3 is negotiating with Iran,
and also supportive in the discussions they have had directly with Iran
about the Bushehr reactor program and the take-back of the fuel, and
the effort to put some proliferation safeguards into whatever
arrangement Russia and Iran come up with respect to Bushehr.
Q I know President Bush praised President Putin for his
recent speech about democracy, but that was also the speech when Mr.
Putin described the collapse of the Soviet Union as the greatest
catastrophe of the 20th century. Did President Bush ask him why
President Putin made that comment?
MR. HADLEY: Not in the discussions that I've been in, but, you
know, that comment isn't too much of a mystery, because if you read it
in context, it's a context he's talking about the kind of humanitarian
and dislocation that the breakup of the Soviet Union caused, and the
problem that that caused for people economically, from a humanitarian
standpoint. That's really not news. I mean, all of you were reporting
that at the time. So I think if you look at that in context, it kind
of explains itself.
Q None of us reported at the time it was the greatest
catastrophe of the 20th century.
MR. HADLEY: No, but we did -- you all did report, as we saw, the
dislocations that were caused at the time.
Q Nobody compared it to the Holocaust or the great terror.
Is this a characterization the United States accepts?
MR. HADLEY: I was asked the question about the comment that he
made about the breakup of the Soviet Union, and I simply said that it
did not come up in conversation, and that if you looked at the text,
that comment explained itself rather clearly.
Q That text in Russia, but --
Q I have two questions, sir -- a follow-up on the North
Koreans. Did both leaders discuss any further option, or a possible
option, going to the U.N. Security Council in the North Korean case?
That's my first question. Also, you mentioned the President's support
of the Japanese permanent membership on the U.N. Security Council.
Did the President explain what -- his support of Japan to President
MR. HADLEY: No, he just noted it, that that has been the position
we'd taken, and he noted that President Putin had talked about
Germany. And there's no real discussion about -- we have said
publically that at some point, if there isn't progress, the discussions
with North Korea would have to go to the Security Council. But that's
been something we've said before.
Q Steve, you mentioned that there are a number of things that
the President liked in the state of the state address from Mr. Putin.
But have you seen any actions, specifically on the points the President
mentioned in his speech in Latvia -- rule of law, economic fairness,
press freedom? Mr. Putin may be saying some things that you like, but
has he done anything?
MR. HADLEY: Well, not in the last 10 days since he's given the
Q What about the last six months?
Q He gave the same speech a year ago.
MR. HADLEY: Well, you know, look -- we've heard some things about
NGOs on the affirmative side. There's a lot on the other side of the
ledger that has raised concerns over the last six months. That's,
obviously, something that is the reason why the President raised it in
Bratislava, and it's a reason why I think he took some hope that --
from the speech that was given today. But one of the things we have
said for some time is, obviously those words have to be translated into
deeds, and we expect that as that happens, it will allow the United
States and Russia to have an even closer relationship, because we've
said many times that in the end of the day, the kind of close
relationship we would like to have with Russia is a relationship that
will require us to share common principles and common values in our
societies, because that's really, you know -- that is really the true
basis of enduring relationship and enduring partnership. So we would
hope for that kind of outcome.
Q Did the President and Mr. Putin discuss any concrete steps
with respect to these political reforms that we're talking about right
now that would be tied to membership in the WTO?
MR. HADLEY: They did not discuss that, no. Okay, thank you.
Q Thank you very much.
END 12:55 A.M. (Local)