President
|
Vice President
|
First Lady
|
Mrs. Cheney
|
News & Policies
History & Tours
|
Kids
|
Your Government
|
Appointments
|
Jobs
|
Contact
|
Graphic version
Email Updates
|
Español
|
Accessibility
|
Search
|
Privacy Policy
|
Help
For Immediate Release
February 24, 2008
FISA Fact Check: Setting the Record Straight on Speaker Pelosi
Despite Speaker Pelosi's Misleading Claims, FISA Is No Substitute For
The Bipartisan Senate Bill; Speaker Pelosi's Continued Refusal To
Permit A Vote On The Senate Bill Is Weakening Our Ability To Protect
The Country From Terrorist Attack
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi claims that "under FISA, the Attorney
General can approve surveillance in minutes. Surveillance can begin immediately
and approval of the FISA Court can be obtained within three days."
(Nancy Pelosi, "Statement On FISA Negotiations," 2/22/08)
- Contrary to Speaker Pelosi's misleading statement, FISA's requirements,
unlike those of the Protect America Act and the bipartisan Senate bill, impair
our ability to collect information on foreign intelligence targets located
overseas. In their letter to the House Permanent Select Committee
Chairman Silvestre Reyes, Attorney General Michael Mukasey and Director of
National Intelligence (DNI) Mike McConnell explained, "FISA was designed
to govern foreign intelligence surveillance of persons in the United States
and therefore requires a showing of 'probable cause' before such surveillance
can begin. … The process of compiling the facts necessary for such a
determination and preparing applications for emergency authorizations [approved
by the Attorney General] takes time and results in delays." (Attorney
General Michael Mukasey and Director Of National Intelligence Mike McConnell,
Letter To Chairman Of The House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence,
2/22/08)
- Attorney General Mukasey and DNI McConnell also explained that "our
intelligence professionals need to be able to obtain foreign intelligence
from foreign targets with speed and agility." "If we revert
to a legal framework in which the Intelligence Community needs to make probable
cause showings for foreign terrorists and other national security threats
located overseas, we are certain to experience more intelligence gaps and
miss collecting information."
- Attorney General Mukasey and DNI McConnell further explained that
"because of the hurdles under FISA's emergency authorization provisions
and the requirement to go to the FISA Court within 72 hours, our resource
constraints limit our use of emergency authorizations to certain high-priority
circumstances and cannot simply be employed for every foreign intelligence
target."
Speaker Pelosi also misleadingly states that "the FISA Court can
approve surveillance orders quickly." (Nancy Pelosi,
"Statement On FISA Negotiations," 2/22/08)
- Attorney General Mukasey and DNI McConnell have made clear that
the FISA Court requires a showing of probable cause before it will authorize
surveillance and satisfying the probable cause requirement will result in
unacceptable gaps and delays in monitoring communications of foreign terrorists
overseas. "Imposing this requirement in the context of surveillance
of foreign targets located overseas results in the loss of potentially vital
intelligence by, for example, delaying intelligence collection and thereby
losing some intelligence forever." (Attorney General
Michael Mukasey and Director Of National Intelligence Mike McConnell, Letter
To Chairman Of The House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence, 2/22/08)
- Attorney General Mukasey and DNI McConnell also stated that "it
makes no sense to require a showing of probable cause for surveillance of
overseas foreign targets who are not entitled to the Fourth Amendment protections
guaranteed by our Constitution." "[Probable cause] makes
sense in the context of targeting persons in the United States for surveillance,
where the Fourth Amendment itself often requires probable cause and where
the civil liberties of Americans are most implicated."
Speaker Pelosi misleadingly asserts that "there is no backlog
of cases to slow down getting surveillance approvals from the FISA court."
(Nancy Pelosi, "Statement On FISA Negotiations," 2/22/08)
- Attorney General Mukasey and DNI Mike McConnell reported, "we
have lost intelligence information this past week as a direct result of the
uncertainty created by Congress' failure to act." (Attorney
General Michael Mukasey and Director Of National Intelligence Mike McConnell,
Letter To Chairman Of The House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence,
2/22/08)
- The Intelligence Community and Department of Justice have worked
over the past week with our private partners – whose assistance is essential
to our intelligence collection efforts – to mitigate this problem caused
by Congress' failure to act, but we have nonetheless missed intelligence information
that we could have been collecting to protect the country. "We
appreciate the willingness of our private partners to cooperate despite the
uncertainty [caused by Congress' failure to pass long-term FISA modernization].
Unfortunately, the delay resulting from [efforts to gain the cooperation of
the private sector after Congress failed to act] impaired our ability to cover
foreign intelligence targets, which resulted in missed intelligence information."
(Department of Justice and Office of The Director Of National
Intelligence, Statement Regarding Cooperation With Private Partners, 2/23/08)
Speaker Pelosi also misleadingly claims "under FISA, telecommunications
companies can be compelled by the FISA court to help with surveillance and have
legal protection for compliance." (Nancy Pelosi,
"Statement On FISA Negotiations," 2/22/08)
- The Attorney General and Director of National Intelligence explained
that, "[e]ven prior to the expiration of the Protect America Act, we
experienced significant difficulties in working with the private sector because
of the continued failure to provide liability protection for such companies."
"These difficulties have only grown since expiration of the Act without
passage of the bipartisan Senate bill, which would provide fair and just liability
protection. Exposing the private sector to the continued risk of billion-dollar
class action suits for assisting in efforts to defend the country understandably
makes the private sector much more reluctant to cooperate. Without their cooperation,
our efforts to protect the country cannot succeed." (Attorney
General Michael Mukasey and Director Of National Intelligence Mike McConnell,
Letter To Chairman Of The House Permanent Select Committee On Intelligence,
2/22/08)
- According to a statement from the Department of Justice and the
Office of the Director of National Intelligence: "[A]lthough our private
partners are cooperating for the time being, they have expressed understandable
misgivings about doing so in light of the on-going uncertainty and have indicated
that they may well discontinue cooperation if the uncertainty persists."
"Even with the cooperation of these private partners under existing directives,
our ability to gather information concerning the intentions and planning of
terrorists and other foreign intelligence targets will continue to degrade
because we have lost tools provided by the Protect America Act that enable
us to adjust to changing circumstances." (Department
of Justice and Office of The Director Of National Intelligence, Statement
Regarding Cooperation With Private Partners, 2/23/08)
- As our Nation's intelligence professionals have explained, "other
intelligence tools [like FISA] simply cannot replace these Protect America
Act authorities. The bipartisan Senate bill contains these authorities, as
well as liability protection for those companies who answered their country’s
call in the aftermath of September 11." (Department
of Justice and Office of the Director Of National Intelligence, Statement
Regarding Cooperation With Private Partners, 2/23/08)
Printer-Friendly Version
Email this page to a friend
more issues