For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
June 26, 2001
Background Briefing
By a Senior Administration Official on President's Meeting With Prime Minister Sharon of Israel the James S. Brady Briefing Room
5:30 P.M. EDT
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION
OFFICIAL: Thank you. As you know, the President
and the Prime Minister met this afternoon. This is the Prime
Minister's second visit to the White House. They met with
their top aides for a little bit over an hour. This was a
very open, serious discussion. The atmosphere in the room, though, I
would say was warm and friendly. These are two men who have, I think,
a great deal of admiration for each other.
The President listened very carefully to what
the Prime Minister had to say about the current situation on the ground
between Israelis and Palestinians. He listened to the Prime
Minister's ideas on how to proceed with the implementation of the
Mitchell Committee Report in all of its elements, including the
sequencing and how we will get from one stage to the next.
The President expressed his personal
appreciation and admiration for Prime Minister Sharon's courageous
demonstration of strength through restraint. He said he
understood the enormous pressures that the Prime Minister is
under. The Prime Minister's policy has helped to create an
opportunity to make progress towards ending the violence, which in the
end can save the lives of innocents on both sides.
The President reaffirmed his judgment, which
you heard in the pool spray, that the cease-fire has gained some
momentum, but still remains extremely fragile. The President
made clear his view that much more work needs to be done; there needs
to be a 100-percent effort to fight terror, to stop incitement and to
end violence. The President stressed his view that it's up
to the parties to make the judgments about how the effort is to
proceed.
The Prime Minister and the President also
covered a great many other issues, including the threats of weapons of
mass destruction in the region, broader threats of terrorism, the
situation in Iran and Iraq. The President gave the Prime
Minister a readout on his discussions with President Putin in Slovenia,
because of the high interest Israel has in those issues.
The President is dispatching Secretary Powell
tonight to the region, in his second visit to the
area. Secretary Powell will work to help the parties
consolidate the cease-fire, and hopefully, to prepare the ground to
move forward with implementation of the Mitchell Committee Report.
Q Did the President
tell the Prime Minister or urge the Prime Minister to move into the
second phase of the Mitchell Report, and that is the cooling
period? Does he consider this now a cooling off period?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The
President did not make any decisions unilaterally about whether we are
in a cooling-off period, or not. As the Secretary of State
has said before, ultimately it is up to the parties when the level of
violence is sufficient that they can move from one stage to the next.
Q Did he give his
impression on where we are now, or --
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The
President reiterated what he said to you in the pool spray, which is
that we have made some progress, but much more work needs to be
done. There is a great deal that still needs to be done in
order to bring violence under control.
Q What is the
President's reaction to Prime Minister Sharon's 10-day statement
outside? He said that he wanted a 10-day period of total
calm before the cooling-off period. Does the President
endorse that 10-day idea?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The
Prime Minister's position has been stated before. I don't
think this was new. What we are looking for now is a way to
move forward. Clearly, we agree that there needs to be a
period of calm. The timing of that, the sequencing, the time
lines are things yet to be worked out, and that's what the Secretary is
going to the region, to see if we can't help move forward.
Q If I can just follow
up on that. In the pool spray, the President said that he
would urge a realistic assessment of what's possible on the
ground. And Prime Minister Sharon is talking about 10 days
of complete quiet. Is that a difference of opinion?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
don't think it's a difference of opinion, but I think it is a
reflection of the very fragile situation. The hold of the
cease-fire remains tenuous. And we need to see efforts by
both parties to try to consolidate it and make it go forward.
Q But would we prefer
Israel not to be so adamant on --
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION
OFFICIAL: This administration's position from day one has
been clear, that we are here to facilitate progress between the
parties, not to impose our views on them.
Q Did the President ask
the Prime Minister to commit for a settlement freeze at this time?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The
President and the Prime Minister spent a great deal of time talking
about the entire Mitchell Committee Report which, as you know, calls
for a settlement freeze. How we will get to that stage of
implementing confidence-building is what still needs to be worked out
and what the Secretary will be going out to the region to work
on. Our view is clear, that the Mitchell Committee Report
should be implemented in all of its elements.
Q What does the Prime
Minister think on that?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
think the Prime Minister has made clear his position
before. We find encouraging the fact that both parties have
accepted the Mitchell Committee Report and we are going to hold to
Mitchell as is, no changes.
Q Where all will the
Secretary be visiting on his trip and exactly how long will he be
gone?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
think that that is still a work in progress. I understand
that we leave imminently to go to Egypt and then we go from there to
Jerusalem. The Secretary, I believe, hopes to be back by the
weekend.
Q Who and how will you
make a determination that there has been a 100-percent effort on both
sides?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
think that's a determination which, as the President said, has to be
based on a reality check. We have to see what's going on, we
have to make that call. We have extensive contacts with both
sides.
As you know, under Director Tenet's work plan,
there are very precise things that each side is supposed to do, and we
feel confident that we'll be able to measure their
effort. But at this stage, we feel that effort is not 100
percent.
Q The Prime Minister
said outside he feels pretty clearly that we need -- he wants 10 days
of total peace and quiet before moving on. The President in
the pool spray made clear that he would be open to moving into a
cooling-off period sooner than that. Can you get into a
little bit how the two of them discussed that and whether the President
yielded to the Prime Minister or --
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The
two of them discussed the situation and how to move
forward. I don't think that in this case there is any
difference on the fundamental, which is there needs to be a reduction
in the level of violence; we have not gotten to that point yet. In the
end, it will be the parties that have to make the decisions about
whether they're prepared to move to the next stage. The
United States cannot do that for them.
Q How is it possible to
lay down these parameters of a 10-day complete cessation of
hostilities, followed by a six-to-eight week period, without, in
effect, handing a veto to the peace process to anybody who can stuff a
can with nails and cordite?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION
OFFICIAL: That's why our view is there has to be a
100-percent effort. The Palestinian Authority must make
100-percent effort to prevent terrorism, to fight terrorists, to stop
incitement, and do what it can to stop violence.
Q With all due respect,
what will 10 days or two months really show us? The last
group of violence that happened three years ago was similar and it
stopped for almost three years, and we're back to the same
situation. What will any particular period of time really
show us?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: The
Mitchell Committee Report lays out a sequence of steps to try to avoid
a return to a pattern of violence. There is no, in the end, perfect
solution here. There is only what the two parties have
prepared to make political risks to do. Our position has
been that we will help them in facilitating, trying to make those hard
decisions.
You're absolutely right; we do not want a
reversion to the past. That's why we have supported the Mitchell
Committee Report in its sequenced approach to try to find a better way
forward.
Q How will the
Secretary's mission succeed with the Prime Minister so determined that
there be 10 days, and only after then, the cooling-off period?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
think the Secretary's mission is designed to see if we can't build on
the fragile momentum we have now, consolidate the situation
more. In the end, this is not an American conflict; it is a
conflict between the parties. And they will have to make
those hard decisions. We can push them forward; we can
encourage them; we can facilitate it. But the decisions on
whether we're going to get there will be Israeli and Palestinian
decisions.
Q So we would expect
the Prime Minister to change his mind? It seems to me that
he's very determined.
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
think that what we have seen over time here is that the Prime Minister
is a man who said he is committed to the Mitchell Committee Report,
which he reiterated to the President. He is committed to the
Tenet work plan and he repeated that to the President. He
wants to make those work.
The President and the Prime Minister agreed
that at this stage, there has not been sufficient reduction in
violence, but we should be looking for ways to move the situation
forward and to build on the fragile momentum that we had since Director
Tenet was in the region.
Q It seems as if the
President, at least at this point, has not made tremendous gains in
changing Prime Minister Sharon's mind about how to get
started. What is the Secretary intending on saying to
Chairman Arafat to move him off --
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
think the Secretary will be very clear with Chairman
Arafat. There has to be 100 percent effort to fight
violence, stop incitement and to try to restore a measure of calm and
trust here.
Q Is 100-percent effort
tantamount to some period of complete quiet, like Sharon said?
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: I
think in the end, that will be something we will have to see when we
get to something where we have 100-percent effort.
Q Are there plans to
involve Arafat more, bring him to Washington to talk to the
President? I mean, so far it seems like this is more of a --
SENIOR ADMINISTRATION OFFICIAL: No
plans at this stage for the Chairman to come here. The
Secretary will be seeing him in less than 48 hours.
END 5:40 P.M. EDT
|