For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
March 22, 2001

Administration's Surplus Estimates Fact Sheet 3/21/01

The Administration's surplus estimates already assume an economic slowdown in 2001. Furthermore, the budget projections also assume that revenue growth slows markedly in 2001, 2002 and beyond relative to last year's heady pace.

Revenue Growth Percent Growth 2000 - Actual 10.8% 2001 - YTD Actual 6.7% 2001 - Admin Forecast 5.5% 2002 - Admin Forecast 3.9%

• Thus, while private forecasters may be noting that revenue growth is decelerating in 2001 relative to 2000, this is consistent with the Administration's assumptions. In fact, year-to-date 2001 revenue growth is actually faster than the Administration has forecast - 6.7% compared with 5.5%.

• A survey of the nation's top Wall Street and economic consulting firms reveals a range of FY2001 surplus forecasts between $250-323 billion. The average of these estimates is $282 billion, virtually identical with the Administration's $284 billion baseline forecast. While Merrill Lynch's $250 billion forecast has received considerable attention, its baseline revenue assumptions are very similar to those of the Administration. The main reasons that Merrill has a lower surplus estimate are higher expected spending growth and tax cuts in 2001. Furthermore, the Wells Fargo estimate quoted in the press ($225 billion) is not the official company forecast, which is actually in line with the Administration's.

Printer-Friendly Version   Email this page to a friend

• Afghanistan
• Africa
• Budget Management
• Defense
• Economy
• Education
• Energy
• Environment
• Global Diplomacy
• Health Care
• Homeland Security
• Immigration
• International Trade
• Iraq
• Judicial Nominations
• Middle East
• National Security
• Veterans

more issues

News

• Current News
• Press Briefings
• Proclamations
• Executive Orders
• Radio
• Setting the Record Straight

more news

March 2007   |   February 2007

News by Date

•   |   February 2007
•   |   January 2007
•   |   December 2006
•   |   November 2006
•   |   October 2006
•   |   September 2006
•   |   August 2006
•   |   July 2006
•   |   June 2006
•   |   May 2006
•   |   April 2006
•   |   March 2006
•   |   February 2006
•   |   January 2006
•   |   December 2005
•   |   November 2005
•   |   October 2005
•   |   September 2005
•   |   August 2005
•   |   July 2005
•   |   June 2005
•   |   May 2005
•   |   April 2005
•   |   March 2005
•   |   February 2005
•   |   January 2005
•   |   December 2004
•   |   November 2004
•   |   October 2004
•   |   September 2004
•   |   August 2004
•   |   July 2004
•   |   June 2004
•   |   May 2004
•   |   April 2004
•   |   March 2004
•   |   February 2004
•   |   January 2004
•   |   December 2003
•   |   November 2003
•   |   October 2003
•   |   September 2003
•   |   August 2003
•   |   July 2003
•   |   June 2003
•   |   May 2003
•   |   April 2003
•   |   March 2003
•   |   February 2003
•   |   January 2003
•   |   December 2002
•   |   November 2002
•   |   October 2002
•   |   September 2002
•   |   August 2002
•   |   July 2002
•   |   June 2002
•   |   May 2002
•   |   April 2002
•   |   March 2002
•   |   February 2002
•   |   January 2002
•   |   December 2001
•   |   November 2001
•   |   October 2001
•   |   September 2001
•   |   August 2001
•   |   July 2001
•   |   June 2001
•   |   May 2001
•   |   April 2001
•   |   March 2001
•   |   February 2001
•   |   January 2001

Appointments

• Nominations

Federal Facts

•   |   Federal Statistics

West Wing

•   |   History