President
|
Vice President
|
First Lady
|
Mrs. Cheney
|
News & Policies
History & Tours
|
Kids
|
Your Government
|
Appointments
|
Jobs
|
Contact
|
Graphic version
Email Updates | Español | Accessibility | Search | Privacy Policy | Help
Printer-Friendly Version Email this page to a friend |
Welcome to "Ask the White House" -- an online interactive forum where you can submit questions to Administration officials and friends of the White House. Visit the "Ask the White House" archives to read other discussions with White House officials.
|
|
February 8, 2007
Stephen L. Johnson
Good afternoon, everyone. It is a pleasure to join you once again on this forum to discuss America's environmental progress. These are truly exciting times for our nation's environment. America's air, water and land are cleaner today than they were just a generation ago. And under the Bush Administration this progress continues. Since EPA was created over 36 years ago, we have laid a strong foundation to shift America into a "green" culture. Today, instead of just EPA employees working to protect the environment, we now have over 300 million Americans as environmental partners. Americans have begun to embrace the fact that environmental responsibility is everyone's responsibility. At the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, we are working to educate citizens and provide everyone the tools to make a real difference in their environment. With that, I'm happy to get to your questions. Aleman, from Baton Rouge
writes: Stephen L. Johnson
In addition to being good for our energy security and good for our economy, renewable fuel is good for our environment because it produces fewer air pollutants and greenhouse gas emissions.
Hunter, from 4th Grade Saranac Elem School Saranac New York writes: Stephen L. Johnson The President is concerned about the effects of climate change as well. Which is why, since 2001, the Bush Administration has invested more than $29 billion to study climate change science, promote energy-efficient and carbon dioxide-reducing technologies, and fund tax incentive programs. Thats more than any other country in the world. And just last month, the President laid out a plan to increase the fuel efficiency of Americas cars. But there are things that each and every one of us can do to reduce the amount of greenhouse gasses we emit in our daily activities commonly referred to as our carbon footprint. Small things like swapping out a traditional light bulb with an energy-efficient bulb, taking public transportation instead of driving a car, or purchasing Energy Star appliances such as TVs or computers that use less energy are ways each of us can reduce our carbon footprint.
Youd be surprised how quickly the results add up. In 2005 alone, by using Energy Star products, Americans saved $12 billion on their energy bills and prevented the release of greenhouse gases equivalent to 23 million cars thats the number of all the cars in the state of California and Illinois combined. Tracey, from Michigan writes: Stephen L. Johnson Inland lakes can be impacted by several different types of pollutants, including nutrients from things like fertilizer, human or animal waste and toxic chemicals. These pollutants can increase the growth of algae, kill fish and make people sick. For years, EPA has been working with our state and local partners to put in place water quality standard regulations to protect and restore waters impacted by pollution.
President Bush is focused on restoring and protecting our lakes, including some of our nations more important environmental treasures the Great Lakes. In addition to investing around $500 million annually for Great Lakes water quality programs, the President requested $57 million in the 2008 budget to fund EPAs efforts to reduce toxics and protect wetlands and watersheds.
Vanessa, from Florida writes: environmental protection agency and what are the requirements to become one? thanks Vanessa (14) Stephen L. Johnson
But truly, it is an honor to be the Administrator of the premier environmental Agency in the world. The job requires a passion for science, a willingness to make tough decisions and a desire to serve the American people. And not a day goes by that Im not reminded of the unique opportunity I have as EPA Administrator to make a lasting difference in our world.
Sue, from CA writes: Stephen L. Johnson The Bush Administration will soon site the first FutureGen Coal Fire Power Plant, which is a power plant that has nearly zero greenhouse gas and air pollution emissions. Also, we are working with industries to capture the release of methane a potent greenhouse gas from sources like landfills, and use it to power their businesses. And internationally, we are collaborating with developing or transitional countries, like China and India and South Korea, to advance clean energy innovations while promoting economic growth.
Through an investment of nearly $3 billion a year, we are developing the technological solutions today which will drive our environmental successes tomorrow.
Christy, from South Dakota
writes: Stephen L. Johnson When homeowners need to buy appliances, ranging from computers to refrigerators, consumers should look for the Energy Star label. The Energy Star label means that not only is the appliance in the top 10% of their market, and its also the most energy efficient. In addition, homeowners should replace all of their incandescent light bulbs to Energy Star compact fluorescent light bulbs. These lights last at least 3-5 years and are significantly more energy efficient. In the year 2005, Americans by buying Energy Star products saved $12 billion in energy costs and saved green house gas emissions, the equivalent to 23 million cars. That is the total amount of cars in California and Illinois combined.
There are many other ways that a consumer can improve energy efficiency in their homes. Please visit the Energy Star Web site:
http://energystar.gov
Jennifer, from Texas writes: Stephen L. Johnson The scientific conclusions reached in that report concluded that global climate change over the last 50 years is very likely the result of human activity. I certainly support the scientific conclusions that they reached. In the US, we have and continue to, invest in the science and the technologies to address green house gas emissions. For example, under the Presidents leadership we are moving off the treadmill of dependence of foreign oil towards renewable fuels and clean coal technologies, which will result in zero emissions.
This is part of a comprehensive, aggressive yet practical plan to address global climate change.
Margie, from New Jersey
writes: Stephen L. Johnson
Stephen L. Johnson |
Printer-Friendly Version
Email this page to a friend
Issues
more issues