CASB
44th Meeting
February 23, 2005
The 44th
meeting of the Cost Accounting Standards Board (CASB) took place in the
Old Executive Office Building, Washington, DC on February 23, 2005. The
meeting was convened at 10:00 a.m. The Board, consisting of the Chair, Mr.
David Safavian, Administrator for Federal Procurement Policy (OFPP), and
Messrs. DiPasquale, Reed, and Waszily were in attendance. Also in attendance
for the entire meeting were Messrs. Shipley and Capitano (acting as Board
staff), and Mr. Burton, Deputy, OFPP.
The Board discussed
the following issues:
CAS Board
Staffing – Short-Term
The Chairmen informed
members that he had arranged a detail of Mr. Capitano from DOD to serve
as the CASB staff during the temporary absence of Dr. Abel. Mr. Capitano
will report to the CASB Chairman but will also be available to all Board
members and their staffs for discussions and progress reports on all CAS
Board initiatives. Dr. Abel, upon his return, will re-assume staff responsibility
for all CAS Board initiatives, with Mr. Capitano providing input when
requested by the Board or Dr. Abel.
CAS Board
Staffing – Long-Term
The Chairman informed
members that, due to OMB/OFPP budget reductions, only one of the two previously
funded permanent CASB staff positions would be retained. Members discussed
the long-term CASB staffing options in light of these limitations. All
agreed that it was important, at this time, to have a CASB staff member
for continuity of on-going cases and administrative matters. The members
also agreed that, for specific projects, the Board should utilize Government
employees detailed from other agencies and/or working groups. The working
groups would consist of Government employees and, to the extent permitted
by FACA, industry representatives. The Chairman stated he would seek OMB
General Counsel advice on FACA requirements as they might apply to joint
industry and Government working groups. Members instructed the staff to
develop some different options for how the working groups might operate
for discussion at the next Board meeting.
Alternative
Disclosure Statement for United Kingdom (UK) Contractors
The members discussed
the request by the UK Ministry of Defence for use of an alternative disclosure
statement by UK contractors. The Board was provided a draft interim rule
permitting UK contractors to submit the British form "Questionnaire
on Method of Allocation of Costs" (QMAC) and its supplement in lieu
of the CASB DS-1. In response to prior CASB inquiries, the UK Ministry
of Defence has also agreed to revise Item 6 of the current QMAC to address
concerns expressed by several Board members. However, the UK Ministry
of Defence deferred making the change until such time as the Board approved
use of the alternative disclosure statement.
The Board approved
the draft interim rule for publication, with the stipulation that the
UK Ministry of Defence proceed with revising Item 6 of the instructions
to the QMAC. The Board instructed the staff to (a) process the interim
rule for publication, and (b) notify the U.K Ministry of Defence of the
Board approval and advise it to proceed with revising Item 6 of the QMAC.
Employee
Stock Ownership Plans (ESOPs)
The CASB published
an ANPRM on August 20, 2003. Ten public comments were submitted in response
to the ANPRM. A Government ESOP Working Group reviewed the ten public
comments and provided its recommendations to the CASB, including draft
language for inclusion in an NPRM.
The members discussed the working group’s recommendations and draft
language. Board members Messrs. DiPasquale and Reed suggested some minor
changes to the draft language. The Board agreed to issuance of an NPRM using
the draft language submitted by the Working Group, modified to reflect the
changes suggested by the Board members. The Board instructed the staff to
develop the NPRM for publication.
The working group
report also included a recommendation by Dr. Abel and Messrs Shipley and
Solomon to consider addressing postretirement benefits in the purpose
section of CAS 415. The Board agreed to take this matter under advisement
as a possible separate case to be discussed at a future CASB meeting.
CAS 404.60(a)
– Capitalization Illustration
The capitalization
illustration at CAS 404.60(a) is inconsistent with the current capitalization
provisions at CAS 404.40(b)(1). The illustration was not revised when
the capitalization thresholds were raised to $5,000 in 1996. The members
concluded that issuing a correction to the final rule issued in 1996 would
be the most efficient method for correcting the inconsistency but expressed
concern whether such a correction was statutorily permitted. The Board
instructed the staff to obtain legal input as to whether a correction
to the 1996 final rule was statutorily permitted, and report back to the
members at the next meeting.
CAS 403 Operating
Revenue Threshold
The operating revenue thresholds at CAS 403-40(c)(2), used in determining
whether a contractor must allocate residual expenses using the three factor
formula, were promulgated in December 1972. The thresholds have not been
revised in the 33 years since the standard was promulgated.
The staff provided the Board with two options for revising the thresholds,
(a) raising the thresholds to reflect the changes in the consumer price
index from 1973 to the present time, and (b) obtaining actual statistics
of various companies and conduct a staff study to determine the impact that
various revisions would have on the number of companies subject to the three-factor
formula.
The members discussed both of these options, and the Board agreed that the
thresholds should be revised. The Board also agreed that the options presented
by the staff provided adequate research to move forward with the four-step
statutory process. Thus, the Board instructed the staff to develop a draft
ANPRM, using the change in the consumer price index as the basis for raising
the thresholds.
Contract
Clause for Foreign Concerns
The members discussed the possible addition of a contract clause for foreign
concerns. On November 4, 1993, the CASB revised the definition of modified
coverage to include CAS 405 and 406, so that modified coverage currently
includes CAS 401, 402, 405, and 406. In conjunction with the revised definition
of modified coverage, the CAS Board also amended the clause at 9903.201-4(c)
to include CAS 405 and 406. However, the requirement for foreign concerns
to comply with only CAS 401 and 402 has remained unchanged. As a result,
the contract clause at 9903.201-4(c), which was previously applicable to
foreign concerns, can no longer be used for foreign concerns without modification
by the parties.
The Board agreed that a contract clause requiring compliance with CAS 401
and 402 by foreign concerns should be added to the CAS. The Board instructed
the staff to develop a clause for discussion at the next meeting.
Requirements
for Foreign Companies to File Disclosure Statements
DoD has raised a potential CAS noncompliance issue that may involve prior
communications with CASB staff. A U.S. contractor is informing a Dutch subcontractor
that a CAS Disclosure Statement is not required unless the foreign company
is an affiliate of a United States company. The position of the U.S. company
is based in part on a July 8, 1994 letter that references a conversation
the company says took place between a company representative and a CASB
staff member. The staff informed members that it is unable to locate any
record of a telephone discussion or a response to the letter by the CASB
or its staff.
DoD has asked for
CASB coordination on a draft letter informing the U.S. company that its
position is not consistent with CAS. The members discussed the role of
the CAS Board and concluded that, in accordance with its Statement of
Objectives, Policies and Concepts, the Board will not intervene or supersede
contractual and administrative procedures for resolving specific Cost
Accounting Standards disputes arising under Government contracts.
Medicare
Contract Reform
Mr. Shipley advised
members that all negotiated contracts awarded for the new Medicare Administration
Contracts under the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization
Act of 2003 will be subject to the CAS rules and regulations.
Adjournment
The meeting was adjourned
at 11:50 A.M.
Minutes
submitted by David J. Capitano, March 4, 2005.