January
11, 1996
MEMORANDUM FOR MEMBERS
OF THE REGULATORY WORKING GROUP
FROM: Sally
Katzen
SUBJECT: Economic
Analysis of Federal Regulations Under Executive
Order No. 12866
Over two years ago, a
subgroup of the Regulatory Working Group started work on a document
to provide agencies with a state-of-the-art discussion of the economic
analysis required by Executive Order No. 12866. Attached is a copy
of the results of that effort. It replaces the "Regulatory Impact
Analysis Guidance" last published in Appendix V of the Regulatory
Program of the United States Government, April 1, 1992-March 31,
1993.
"Economic Analysis
of Federal Regulations" was drafted by an RWG interagency working
group chaired by Joe Stiglitz of CEA and then-General Counsel of the
Department of Transportation, Steve Kaplan. This document represents
the results of an exhaustive two-year effort by the group to describe
"best practices" for preparing the economic analysis of a significant
regulatory action called for by E.O. 12866. It is designed to help agencies
meet the analytic requirements of E.O. 12866, as well as those of the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995 and the Regulatory Flexibility Act.
As is pointed out in its
introduction, the document "is not in the form of a mechanistic
blueprint, for a good EA [economic analysis] cannot be written according
to a formula." Furthermore, it acknowledges that "the amount
of analysis (whether scientific, statistical, or economic) that a particular
issue requires depends on the need for more thorough analysis because
of the importance and complexity of the issue, the need for expedition,
the nature of the statutory language and the extent of statutory descretion,
and the sensitivity of net benefits to the choice of regulatory alternatives." Clearly,
good data and good analysis are critical to inform sound decisionmaking,
and over the years the federal government has increasingly used such
analysis to improve the regulatory system. The document covers three
important elements of regulatory economic analysis: the statement of
need for the proposed action; the examination of alternative approaches;
and, the analysis of benefits and costs.
We appreciate the assistance
you and your staff have provided, and believe that the result of this
effort will be helpful in your development of new regulations and ongoing
evaluation of your current regulatory programs.