June 28, 1999
The Administration strongly opposes enactment of H.R. 1218 in its current form. If a bill is presented to the President that fails to address the concerns that are described below, the President's senior advisers will recommend that he veto it.
During Congressional consideration of almost identical bills during the 105th Congress, the Administration, in Statements of Administration Policy and in letters from former White House Chief of Staff Erskine Bowles to the House and Senate Committees on the Judiciary, stated that it would support properly crafted legislation that would make it illegal to transport minors across State lines for the purpose of avoiding parental involvement requirements. Unfortunately, H.R. 1218, as reported by the House Committee on the Judiciary, also fails to address a number of the critical concerns raised by the Administration. Specifically, the bill must be amended to:
The Administration continues to be concerned that H.R. 1218 raises important federalism issues, including the rights of States to regulate matters within their own boundaries. The Administration believes, however, that legislation that addresses the concerns noted above, and that is carefully targeted at punishing non-relatives who transport minors across State lines for the purpose of avoiding parental involvement requirements, would mitigate the federalism concerns and the Administration's other concerns.
H.R. 1218 could affect both direct spending and receipts; therefore, it is subject to the pay-as-you-go requirement of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. OMB's preliminary scoring estimate of this bill is that it would have a net effect of less than $500,000.