Office of Management and Budget
Executive Office of the President
  Site Search     
 
About OMB  
- Organization Chart
- Contact OMB
 
President's Budget
- Budget Documents
- Supplementals, Budget Amendments, and Releases
Federal Management
- President's Management Agenda
- Office of Federal Financial
Management
-- Agency Audits
- Office of Federal Procurement
Policy
  -- CAS Board
-- FAIR Act Inventory
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
- OIRA Administrator
- Regulatory Matters
- Paperwork Requirements
- Statistical Programs & Standards
- Information Policy, IT & E-Gov
Communications & Media
- News Releases
- Speeches
Legislative Information
- Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)
- Testimony
- Reports to Congress
Information for Agencies
- Circulars
- Memoranda
- Bulletins
- Pivacy Guidance
- Grants Management
- Reports
Site Map
First Gov  
eGov
|

September 15, 1999
(House)


H.R. 1655 - Department of Energy Research, Development,
and Demonstration Authorization Act of 1999

(Calvert (R) CA)

The Administration opposes H.R. 1655 because the bill would hamper the Department of Energy's ability to carry out its research and development programs. Specifically, the bill would impose numerous counterproductive conditions and restrictions on construction, procurement, and management, including excessive restrictions on foreign visitors at civilian laboratories. Most significantly, the bill would adversely affect the construction of the Spallation Neutron Source by authorizing insufficient funding and imposing unneeded reporting requirements. These provisions would only serve to delay the project and increase its costs. This critically important facility is needed to help the United States recapture its position of world leadership in neutron science and related industrial and biomedical applications. Similarly, the bill would reduce authorized funding for the Climate Change Technology Initiative and thereby delay important developments in fuel efficiency and renewable energy technology. The Administration would strongly support amendments to increase funding for these programs at least to the levels requested in the President's budget.