Office of Management and Budget
Executive Office of the President
  Site Search     
 
About OMB  
- Organization Chart
- Contact OMB
 
President's Budget
- Budget Documents
- Supplementals, Budget Amendments, and Releases
Federal Management
- President's Management Agenda
- Office of Federal Financial
Management
-- Agency Audits
- Office of Federal Procurement
Policy
  -- CAS Board
-- FAIR Act Inventory
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
- OIRA Administrator
- Regulatory Matters
- Paperwork Requirements
- Statistical Programs & Standards
- Information Policy, IT & E-Gov
Communications & Media
- News Releases
- Speeches
Legislative Information
- Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)
- Testimony
- Reports to Congress
Information for Agencies
- Circulars
- Memoranda
- Bulletins
- Pivacy Guidance
- Grants Management
- Reports
Site Map
First Gov  
eGov
|

May 19, 1998
(House)


H.R. 3809 - Drug Free Borders Act of 1998
(Crane (R) Illinois and 2 cosponsors)

The Administration strongly supports the objective of H.R. 3809, which is to increase efforts by the U.S. Customs Service to reduce the entry of illicit narcotics into the United States. The Administration opposes, however, certain provisions of H.R. 3809. While increased personnel flexibility has proved useful at certain ports and may be needed elsewhere, the provision that would permit the Customs Commissioner to override collective bargaining agreements in certain situations is inconsistent with the Administration's commitment to labor-management partnerships. In addition, at this time the Administration opposes the inclusion in H.R. 3809 of provisions that would amend the annual cap on overtime pay for Customs inspectors. These provisions should be considered in the context of achieving overall consistency in pay, including overtime and its treatment for retirement purposes, between the Customs Service and similarly situated Federal Inspection Service agencies.

The Administration looks forward to working with the Congress to: (1) address the concerns noted above; (2) conform the authorization levels to those in the President's Budget; and (3) provide for greater flexibility in the allocation of resources and the selection of technologies.