Office of Management and Budget
Executive Office of the President
  Site Search     
About OMB  
- Organization Chart
- Contact OMB
President's Budget
- Budget Documents
- Supplementals, Budget Amendments, and Releases
Federal Management
- President's Management Agenda
- Office of Federal Financial
-- Agency Audits
- Office of Federal Procurement
  -- CAS Board
-- FAIR Act Inventory
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
- OIRA Administrator
- Regulatory Matters
- Paperwork Requirements
- Statistical Programs & Standards
- Information Policy, IT & E-Gov
Communications & Media
- News Releases
- Speeches
Legislative Information
- Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)
- Testimony
- Reports to Congress
Information for Agencies
- Circulars
- Memoranda
- Bulletins
- Pivacy Guidance
- Grants Management
- Reports
Site Map
First Gov  

June 3, 1998
(House Rules)

H.J.Res. 78 - Joint Resolution Proposing an Amendment
to the Constitution of the United States
Restoring Religious Freedom

(Istook (R) Oklahoma and 153 cosponsors)

The Administration strongly opposes House passage of H.J.Res. 78. The Nation currently has a constitutional amendment that protects religious liberty -- the First Amendment. As the Administration's guidelines on religious practices in schools make clear, public school students are free to voluntarily pray privately and individually at school. Students have a right to say grace at lunchtime. They have the right to meet in religious groups on school grounds and use school facilities like any other school club. They have the right to read the Bible, or any religious text during study hall or other free class time. Similarly, people who wish to engage in religious expression on public property have the same rights as people who wish to engage in comparable nonreligious expression.

Not only is a new constitutional amendment unnecessary, H.J.Res. 78 would, in a variety of ways, undermine the religious freedom we now cherish; would embroil State and local governments in years of divisive and costly debate and litigation over its meaning; and could well require our taxpaying citizens to provide financial support to churches, parochial schools, and other pervasively religious institutions.

For over 200 years, the First Amendment has protected our rights to be as religious as we choose. Congress should not tamper with this most precious liberty. The First Amendment should not be rewritten.