The Administration supports House passage of H.R. 2676 as an important step in
the process of Internal Revenue Service (IRS) reform that has been ongoing over
the past two years. The bill reflects an emerging consensus on the need for
additional taxpayer rights, for institutionalized oversight of the IRS, for
greater continuity of leadership at the IRS, and for improved access to private
sector input on customer service and technology. The Administration worked
extensively with the bill's sponsor and other Members to resolve differences
contained in earlier versions of IRS reform proposals, and is pleased that H.R.
2676 incorporates many of the Administration proposals regarding:
The Administration's review of the bill is continuing. Based on its initial
review, the Administration will continue to work with the Congress to make
needed improvements to the bill in the following areas:
- Executive branch accountability under the Constitution, including
Presidential appointment and Senate confirmation of the IRS Commissioner, as
well as preserving the authority of the Secretary of the Treasury to administer
and enforce provisions of internal revenue laws;
- retention of exclusive responsibility for any and all IRS law enforcement
responsibilities with full-time government employees;
- additional taxpayer rights protections; and
- expansion of electronic filing.
- Personnel Flexibilities. The Administration believes the personnel
flexibility provisions need substantial revision to strengthen the IRS'
ability to attract and retain the highly skilled and motivated workforce needed
to make necessary improvements in information technology, customer service, and
- Burden of Proof. The Administration continues to be concerned about
this provision and wants to ensure that taxpayers are not provided a
disincentive to keep records to support positions on their tax returns. In
addition, the Administration is concerned that the provision may have
unintended consequences, including making audits more intrusive.
- Conflicts of Interest. The Administration will work with the
Congress to make the changes needed to ensure that the members of the Oversight
Board are appropriately covered by conflict of interest laws.
- Other Concerns. The Administration notes that constitutional
concerns have been raised regarding the restriction on the President's
appointment authority contained in section 101(a) and the restrictions on
Executive authority in section 104. The Administration also has concerns
regarding the accountant-client privilege and wants to ensure that bona fide
law enforcement needs are not undercut.
H.R. 2676 is subject to the pay-as-you-go requirements of the Omnibus Budget
Reconciliation Act of 1990. The Administration's pay-as-you-go estimates for
this bill are under development, but very preliminary analysis suggests that
the aggregate revenue losses and spending increases may substantially exceed
the revenue offset in title V of the bill. The Balanced Budget Act of 1997
reduced the PAYGO balances to zero, and, consequently, any bill that would
increase mandatory spending or result in a net revenue loss would contribute to
a sequester of mandatory programs as called for in the Budget Enforcement Act.
In the case of H.R. 2676, the bill may not contain provisions sufficient to
offset the net deficit increases. As a result, if the bill were enacted, any
deficit effects could contribute to a sequester of mandatory spending. The
Administration supports this bill, but will work with the Congress to ensure
that such an unintended sequester does not occur.