Office of Management and Budget
Executive Office of the President
  Site Search     
About OMB  
- Organization Chart
- Contact OMB
President's Budget
- Budget Documents
- Supplementals, Budget Amendments, and Releases
Federal Management
- President's Management Agenda
- Office of Federal Financial
-- Agency Audits
- Office of Federal Procurement
  -- CAS Board
-- FAIR Act Inventory
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs
- OIRA Administrator
- Regulatory Matters
- Paperwork Requirements
- Statistical Programs & Standards
- Information Policy, IT & E-Gov
Communications & Media
- News Releases
- Speeches
Legislative Information
- Statements of Administration Policy (SAPs)
- Testimony
- Reports to Congress
Information for Agencies
- Circulars
- Memoranda
- Bulletins
- Pivacy Guidance
- Grants Management
- Reports
Site Map
First Gov  

October 3, 2001

Mr. Tim McClain
General Counsel
Department of Veterans Affairs
810 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20420

Dear Mr. McClain:

     For the reasons described below, we are returning to you for reconsideration a draft proposed rule from the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) entitled, "Medical Care and Treatment for Which VA Will Not Seek Reimbursement submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) under Executive Order (E.O.) No. 12866 on February 22, 2001.


     This proposed rule would create a new category of medical claims for which the Veterans Health Administration (VHA) would not seek reimbursement from veterans' insurance companies. Currently VA does not charge insurance companies for care of a veteran's service - connected disability. The proposed rule would extend this billing policy to the "manifestations" of service-connected disabilities.


     "Service - connected disabilities" are well established and clearly defined in 38 USC 1110, and throughout regulations used by VA for the purposes of adjudicating benefits in scores of regulations. The Veterans Benefits Administration (VBA) manages the disability compensation program and makes the determination as to whether a disability is service-connected, paying the veteran a monthly amount accordingly. "Manifestations" are not defined in statute or regulations. VA staff have acknowledged the near impossibility of defining this vague term. As such, the term "manifestations" is subject to interpretation and will likely result in different practices within VHA, generating confusion among providers, staff, and veterans. While VA staff have argued that there are currently inconsistencies in billing practices, OMB has not been presented with evidence of this problem or evidence of how this rule would reduce, rather than increase inconsistency.


     Furthermore, veterans may begin to equate "manifestations" with "service-connected;" seeking and pressuring VBA for greater compensation amounts for "manifestations" which may be found to be non-service-connected disabilities. Due to the concerns identified above, we are returning this rule for your reconsideration under Executive Order 12866. Our staff is available for further discussion with you on these issues.




John D. Graham
Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs