March
9, 2000
OMB BULLETIN NO.
00-02
TO THE HEADS OF EXECUTIVE
DEPARTMENTS AND ESTABLISHMENTS
SUBJECT: |
Guidance
on Aggregation and Allocation of Data on Race for Use in Civil
Rights Monitoring and Enforcement |
- Purpose:
This Bulletin establishes guidance for agencies that collect or
use aggregate data on race. It also establishes guidance for the
allocation of multiple race responses for use in civil rights
monitoring and enforcement.
- Background:
The Office of Management and Budget (OMB) announced revisions
to the standards for classification of Federal data on race and
ethnicity in a Federal Register Notice of October 30,
1997 (62 FR 58782-58790). Revisions to these standards followed
a lengthy process that included considerable public involvement
and active participation from more than 30 Federal agencies. The
revised standards require, among other things, that agencies offer
individuals the opportunity to select one or more races when reporting
information on race in Federal data collections. The five minimum
race categories are American Indian or Alaska Native, Asian, Black
or African American, Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander,
and White.
Census 2000 will
be the first nationwide implementation of the revised standards.
Data from Census 2000 will capture more accurately the increasing
diversity of the Nation's population. Results from Census 2000
will display the full range of single and multiple race reporting
by the American people.
As the revised standards
for collecting and presenting data are implemented, we must
ensure that we maintain our ability to monitor compliance with
laws that offer protections for those who historically have
experienced discrimination. In addition, we must minimize reporting
burden for institutions such as schools and businesses that
report aggregate data on race to Federal agencies.
In response to requests
from agencies responsible for monitoring and enforcing civil
rights laws, OMB has led an interagency group to develop guidance.
This guidance addresses the collection of aggregate data when
agencies request information from businesses, schools, and other
entities. The guidance also addresses the allocation by agencies
of responses, whether individual or aggregate, for use in civil
rights monitoring and enforcement.
- Guidance
for aggregation and allocation of multiple race responses for
use in civil rights monitoring and enforcement: The attached
guidance is designed to be straightforward and easy to implement.
It provides consistency across agencies responsible for enforcing
civil rights laws, and does not preclude the use of more detailed
data if an agency chooses to do so. The guidance does not involve
methods that require either fractional or double counting of individuals,
or arbitrary allocation of responses to one minority group versus
another.
- Implementation
process: OMB will continue to work closely with the enforcement
agencies and the civil rights community to assess these methods
as they are implemented over the next few years and to consider
the need for future modifications. The guidance provided in this
Bulletin will be reflected in the Provisional Guidance on the
Implementation of the 1997 Standards for Federal Data on Race
and Ethnicity that will be available from OMB later this year.
- Inquiries:
Inquiries concerning the information in this Bulletin should be
directed to Katherine K. Wallman, Chief Statistician (202-395-3093).
Jacob J. Lew
Director
Attachment
Guidance
on Aggregation and Allocation of Multiple Race Responses
for Use in Civil Rights Monitoring and Enforcement
I. Aggregation
Guidance: Census 2000 will provide 63 categories of data
on the population by race; these data will be available by April
1, 2001, at the national, state, local, and census tract levels.
Data collected by Federal enforcement agencies often are provided
by businesses and institutions in aggregate form. To facilitate
agency efforts to work with data on race, an aggregation method
is presented below. This method keeps intact the five single race
categories, and includes the four double race combinations most
frequently reported in recent studies. The method also provides
for the collection of information on any multiple race combinations
that comprise more than one percent of the population of interest.
Based on data from Census 2000, responsible agencies will determine
which additional combinations meet the one percent threshold for
the relevant jurisdictions. A balance category is provided to
report those individual responses that are not included in (1)
one of the five single race categories or four double race combinations
or (2) other combinations that represent more than one percent
of the population in a jurisdiction. The following example
illustrates this guidance.
1 |
American Indian
or Alaska Native |
2 |
Asian |
3 |
Black or African
American |
4 |
Native Hawaiian
or Other Pacific Islander |
5 |
White |
6 |
American Indian
or Alaska Native and White |
7 |
Asian and
White |
8 |
Black or African
American and White |
9 |
American Indian
or Alaska Native and Black or African American |
10 |
> 1 percent:
Fill in if applicable(1)______________________ |
11 |
> 1 percent:
Fill in if applicable______________________ |
12 |
Balance of individuals
reporting more than one race |
13 |
Total |
II. Allocation
Guidance: Federal agencies will use the following rules
to allocate multiple race responses for use in civil rights monitoring
and enforcement.
- Responses in the
five single race categories are not allocated.
- Responses that
combine one minority race and white are allocated to the minority
race.
- Responses that
include two or more minority races are allocated as follows:
- If the enforcement
action is in response to a complaint, allocate to the race
that the complainant alleges the discrimination was based
on.
- If the enforcement
action requires assessing disparate impact or discriminatory
patterns, analyze the patterns based on alternative allocations
to each of the minority groups.
Allocation for enforcement
purposes should not be confused with various allocation methods
under consideration for "bridging" to past data collections as
described in OMB's Provisional Guidance on the Implementation
of the 1997 Standards for Federal Data on Race and Ethnicity.
These bridging methods would take advantage of information being
gleaned from Census 2000 and other experimental work being carried
out by the statistical agencies. The principal purpose of allocation
for bridging is to conduct trend or time series analysis.
1.
Based on Census 2000 data, agencies will determine the
race combinations that meet the one percent threshold. For example,
in Hawaii there may well be combinations of race groups that meet
this threshold such as Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
and Asian, or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
and White, or Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
and Asian and White.
|