Office of Management and Budget | Print this document |
OMB BULLETIN NO. 96-02
SUBJECT: Consolidation of Agency Data Centers
1. Purpose. This Bulletin provides guidelines for significantly reducing the number of agency data centers and reducing the total cost of data center operations governmentwide. This Bulletin calls for agencies to:
2. Background. The National Performance Review (NPR) report, Reengineering Through Information Technology, includes a recommendation to develop a Governmentwide data processing consolidation and modernization plan. Industry experience suggests operational savings of between 30 percent and 50 percent from consolidation when compared with unconsolidated operations. With the assistance of the NPR and the Council of Federal Data Center Directors, a committee was formed to assist in collecting and analyzing information on today's agency data center environment. The committee's report, Consolidation of Federal Data Centers, recommends a data center consolidation strategy and provides a plan for implementing the recommended strategy. Information on obtaining copies of the report can be found in Attachment 1.
3. Applicability. This Bulletin applies to all Executive agencies that operate or finance the operation of agency data centers that support Government missions.
4. Policy. Agencies are allowed considerable discretion as to which data center(s) to retain and which to close so long as (1) the selected consolidation scenario is cost-effective and the best value, and (2) minimal data center target sizes are met.
Agencies should strive for revenue neutral consolidation plans with capital and operating expenditure savings being used to fund the consolidation effort. Agencies should conduct business case analyses to determine whether a site should be expanded into a consolidated agency data center or phased out.
5. Exceptions. OMB will consider exceptions to the guidance and policy contained in this Bulletin on a case-by-case basis. All requests for exceptions shall be submitted by the agency's chief operating officer or comparable official. Exception requests should be directed to the OMB policy official with responsibility for the agency requesting the exception. Requests for exceptions should also be noted in summary and progress reports.
6. Definitions. As used in this Bulletin:
7. Responsibilities.
8. Submission Requirements. Agencies are asked to provide the required summary and progress reports to Sally Katzen, Administrator, Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Room 10236, NEOB, Washington, D.C. 20503.
9. Information Contacts. Specific agency concerns should be directed to the agency's program examiner. General questions regarding Attachments 1-4 of the Bulletin can be directed to Jasmeet Seehra at 202-395-3123.
10. Termination Date. This Bulletin expires three years from date of issuance.
Alice M. Rivlin
Director
Attachment 1 - Inventory
of Agency Data Centers
Attachment 2 - Data Center Consolidation Strategy
Attachment 3 - Summary of Implementation Plans
Attachment 4 - Semi-annual Report on the Status of Consolidation
Agencies will provide for OMB review an aggregate data center inventory for the agency containing the elements identified in section 1.2. In order to develop the aggregate information, agencies will conduct site surveys of data centers to establish the agency's current information processing environment, including technical, staffing, and cost data. Agencies will then develop a single site survey database to accommodate the results of all site surveys. For many agencies, the report of the interagency committee, Consolidation of Federal Data Centers, will be a good starting point for developing an inventory.
1.1 Individual Data Center Inventory. Agencies will collect the following site-level technical, staffing, and cost data for each data center:
(a) Data center name,
location, and primary mission;
(b) Basic hardware configuration:
(c) Federal and contractor data center staff, including data center management personnel, computer operators, computer systems programmers, communications specialists, and administrative and support staff; and
(d) FY 1995 costs for hardware (purchase, lease, and maintenance); software (purchase, licenses,and maintenance); staffing (direct and indirect); utilities; facilities (purchase, lease, and maintenance); communications (voice and data); and contract services. A suggested format the individual data center inventory is provided below.
Individual Data Center Inventory
Reports are populated with sample data for illustrative purposes.
Department of _________(Department Name)_________
General Information
Data center name | Data Center Name |
Data center location | Complete Address |
Primary Mission | Briefly describe primary service provided by Data Center |
Basic Hardware Configuration
Mainframe Processors
Quantity | Make/Model | Processor Rating | Total
Processing Power Quantity X Processor Rating |
|
-- | 2 | IBM 3090-300S | 58 MIPS | 116 MIPS |
-- | 2 | Unisys 2200-644 | 53 MIPS | 106 MIPS |
Total | 4 | -- | -- | 222 MIPS |
Small and Mid-Tier Processors
Quantity |
Make/Model |
Primary
Use |
|
4 |
DEC VAX 4000/70A | Departmental client server | |
5 |
IBM AS/400 Model 9406 | Distributed departmental processing | |
3 |
HP 9000 Model 800/H40 | Departmental client server | |
Total | 12 |
-- | -- |
Number of Staff
Federal |
Contractor |
Total |
|
Management | 3 |
0 |
3 |
Operations/Productions Recovery |
5 |
3 |
8 |
Computer
System Programmers |
2 |
2 |
4 |
Communications/ Network Support |
0 |
3 |
3 |
Administrative
and Support Staff |
4 |
4 |
8 |
Total | 14 |
12 |
26 |
Data Center Cost Recovery
Cost Element | Congressionally Appropriated |
Revenues
Derived From Services |
|
Hardware | Purchases | $1,000,000.00 |
$500,000.00 |
-- | Lease | -
0 - |
$100,000.00 |
-- | Maintenance | $70,000.00 |
$40,000.00 |
-- | Total | $1,070,000.00 |
$640,000.00 |
Software | Purchases | $30,000.00 |
$42,000.00 |
-- | Licenses | $42,000.00 |
$30,000.00 |
-- | Maintenance | $40,000.00 |
$40,000.00 |
-- | Total | $112.000.00 |
$112,000.00 |
Staffing
(Federal FTEs only) |
Direct | $1,000,000.00 |
$500,000.00 |
-- | Indirect | $200,000.00 |
$100,000.00 |
-- | Total | $1,200,000.00 |
$600,000.00 |
Utilities | -- | $200,000.00 |
$100,000.00 |
Facilities | Purchase | -
0 - |
-
0 - |
-- | Lease | $200,000.00 |
$100,000.00 |
-- | Maintenance | $70,000.00 |
$40,000.00 |
-- | Total | $270,000.00 |
$140,000.00 |
Communications | Voice | $70,000.00 |
$70,000.00 |
-- | Data | $100,000.00 |
$100,000.00 |
-- | Total | $170,000.00 |
$170,000.00 |
Contract Services* |
-- | $200,000.00 |
$100,000.00 |
Other
(Please Specify) |
-- | -
0 - |
-
0 - |
Grand Total | -- | $3,222,000.00 |
$1,862,000.00 |
*Contract staffing is reported under contract services
1.2 Aggregate Data Center Inventory. Agencies will provide to OMB in the format shown below a summary report that aggregates the technical , staffing, and data elements at the agency level; total costs for each element for FY 1995, and total agency costs for FY 1995.
Department of ________Department Name ______________
Total Mainframe Product Line Processing Power
Product line | Total
Processing Power* |
Amdahal | 325
MIPS |
Honeywell | 75
MIPS |
Digital | 200
VUPS |
Total | 600 |
* Dissimilar processing power rating units should be aggregated when completing this table (see Attachment 2).
Small and Mid-Tier Processors
Product Line | Quantity |
Hewlett Packard | 32 |
Netframe | 12 |
Total | 44 |
Number of Staff
Agency Aggregate Data Center Cost Recovery
Cost Element | Congressionally appropriated |
Derived
from Services |
Hardware | $5,350,000.00 |
$3,200,000.00 |
Software | $560,000.00 |
$220,000.00 |
Staffing (Federal FTEs only) | $6,000,000.00 |
$3,000,000.00 |
Utilities | $1,000,000.00 |
$500,000.00 |
Facilities | $1,350,000.00 |
$700,000.00 |
Communications | $850,000.00 |
$850,000.00 |
Contract Services* | $1,000,000.00 |
$500,000.00 |
Other (Please specify) | -
0 - |
-
0 - |
Total | $16,110,000.00 |
$9,310,000.00 |
*Contract staffing should be reported under contract services
List of Data Centers
Data Center | Computed Data Center Size* |
St. Louis | 325 MIPS |
Seattle, WA | 200 MIPS |
Washington, D.C. | 75 VUPS |
Total | 600 |
* Dissimilar processing power rating units should be aggregated when completing this table -- see attachment 2.
Agencies will develop a data center consolidation strategy to meet the target sizes set out below.
2.1 Target Sizes. The following minimum target sizes are established for the various large scale computing product lines. These minimal target sizes are based on the central processing units housed at a particular center. The targets do not include the processing capacity of the small and mid-tier machines installed at the site. Note that these are minimum targets and that agencies are encouraged to set higher targets where cost-effective.
PRODUCT LINE |
DIGITAL |
HONEYWELL |
IBM/IBM COMPATIBLE |
UNISYS |
Minimal Size | 225
VUPS |
175
MIPS |
325
MIPS |
225
MIPS |
The minimal target size in a heterogeneous product line environment shall be that of the product line with the highest minimal target sizes. With concurrence of the agency's chief operating officer or comparable official, the minimal target size shall be the numerical average of the several product lines.
Departmental high performance scientific processors (except embedded machines and those used principally for research) should be consolidated (1) into a single location or (2) into the same facilities that house general purpose computers. When consolidated into general purpose computer facilities, these machines should not be included in the minimal target size computation. However, housing scientific processors at a particular center may be used to economically justify a center that would otherwise be at least 90 percent of the minimal target size. Similarly, housing of a large number of small and mid-tier processors may be used to economically justify a center that would otherwise be at least 90 percent of the minimal target size.
2.2 Data Center Consolidation Strategy. Each agency will submit by June 3, 1996 a data center consolidation strategy addressing the following elements:
Each agency should develop an agency-wide Data Center Consolidation Implementation Plan describing how the agency will achieve the objectives of its consolidation strategy. A summary of this plan will be provided to OMB for review by September 2, 1996. The agency's Data Center Consolidation Implementation Plan serves as a project master plan that allows the agency to monitor progress and facilitates semiannual reporting to OMB. The plan, which evolves as the consolidation effort progresses, contains the consolidation strategy, project tasks resources required, roles and responsibilities, and master schedule of consolidation project tasks and milestones.
To ensure the completeness and consistency of supporting documents and plans, which will become attachments to the plan, the agency's Data Center Consolidation Implementation Plan should include the following:
3.1 Detailed Technical Architecture - The detailed technical architecture for each consolidated data center should describe: (1) the information processing environment, including processor platforms, on-line storage requirements, output devices, terminals, communications and network devices, and other peripheral devices; (2) resource allocation by user environments; (3) commercial-off-the-shelf software, and operating system software; (4) the physical layout including hardware placement, cabling, communications, power distribution, and HVAC requirements; and (5) the configuration of all sites affected by this Bulletin, including network connectivity and output devices.
3.2 Transition Plan - Depending on the size and complexity of the consolidated data center architecture, detailed transition plans may be developed for each receiving or closing site. A Transition Plan outlines the required activities and documents the process for: (1) conducting the final closing site baseline of workload mix and corresponding performance levels that must be met by the receiving site prior to acceptance; (2) reconfiguration of the receiving site to accommodate additional data processing and communications workload requirements; (3) systems integration and testing to ensure that the configuration meets the design specifications; (4) moving the data processing workloads from closing sites to the receiving site; (5) receiving site coordination with closing site customers during the acceptance to ensure, in accordance with mutually agreed-upon criteria, that they are receiving service at least equal to that provided in the closing system environment; (6) close-out activities that will be undertaken after the closing site is successfully transitioned and accepted at the receiving site; and (7) moving the receiving site data processing workloads to an optimal processing configuration. The transition plan includes a schedule showing start and end dates for transition tasks and milestones.
3.3 Concept of Operation Plan - The concept of operation plan should identify the performance goals and objectives of the consolidated data center and define how the consolidated data center will operate to meet those goals and objectives. Consolidated data center policies and procedures should be designed according to best practices, provide service at least equal to that provided by the closing sites, place responsibilities at the lowest workable level, and promote standardization among the agency's consolidated data centers. The concept of operation should define the consolidated data center's approach to: (1) customer support and problem resolution; (2) capacity management, including capacity planning, service level management, and performance management; (3) configuration and change management; (4) customer and data center security management responsibilities; (5) production scheduling and production problem resolution; (6) tape management; and (7) direct access storage device (DASD) management.
3.4 Security Plan and Disaster Recovery Plan - The agency should review and revise as necessary its information systems security program policies and procedures to reflect the requirements of the consolidated data center environment. Data center security plans should (1) define the security environment, (2) identify security requirements, (3) establish customer and data center security roles and responsibilities, (4) describe core security services provided by the data center and any customer-unique security services, (5) describe how security services will be provided and periodically reviewed and tested, and (6) identify security training and awareness activities. The data center security plan should be supported by documented procedures. The agency should establish a disaster recovery plan that (1) identifies critical agency operations and (2) describes how critical agency operations will be recovered in the event of a disaster. Agencies should consider commercial disaster recovery solutions offered through the GSA.
3.6 Resources Management Technical Plan (Funding Plan) - Detailed consolidation spending plans should reflect all projected consolidation project costs including (1) capital investments, (2) TDY travel and relocation, (3) equipment transportation, (4) software licenses, (5) human resources implementation costs, (6) communications costs, (7) facility improvements, and (8) disaster recovery.
3.7 Human Resources Plan - Agencies should develop a human resources plan with the objectives of retaining necessary personnel at closing sites until the sites are successfully transitioned, establishing qualifications for consolidated data center personnel, and providing options for closing site personnel. The human resources plan should include: (1) data center personnel skills requirements, (2) data center personnel skills inventory, (3) transfer options, (4) training options, and (5) outplacement options.
3.8 Acquisition Plan - Acquisition plans should be developed to support agency data center consolidation and modernization efforts that require upgraded or new hardware, software, and communications equipment; facility improvements; and physical, personnel, and information systems security improvements.
3.9 Fee-for-Service Structure - If the receiving data center has a fee-for-service chargeback structure in place, it should be expanded to include new customers. If the receiving center has not operated on a fee-for-service basis, a chargeback structure and corresponding procedures should be established and implemented as new customers begin using the data center. The fee-for-service structure should (1) track system usage, (2) monitor operational costs, (3) establish service rates, and (4) bill users. For the purposes of the data consolidation plan, data center operations should be considered separate from other non-related business activities supported in the same working capital fund.
3.10 Optimization Plan - Optimization plans encompass the design and implementation activities for building an optimal agencywide processing configuration in all consolidated data centers. An optimization plan should identify efforts to optimize data center operations through standardization of operating systems, database management systems, programming languages, and off-the-shelf software; modernization, including technology insertions and communications and hardware upgrades; automation; and reengineering.
Agencies will provide to OMB on a semi-annual basis beginning January 30, 1997, the following Major Consolidation Milestones report. For each milestone contained in the Major Consolidation Milestones report, the agency should develop subordinate consolidation milestones with planned and actual completion dates.
Failure to achieve the planned completion date for Major Consolidation Milestones must be accompanied by a narrative explanation and a recovery plan to return to schedule by the next semi-annual reporting date.
Semi-Annual Reporting
Major Consolidation Milestones
Major Consolidation Milestone | Planned
Completion Date |
Actual
Completion Date |
Conduct Data Center Inventory | -- |
-- |
Develop Consolidation Strategy | -- |
-- |
Develop Implementation Plan | -- |
-- |
Insert
Agency Specific Milestones from Implementation Plan |
-- |
-- |
Complete Consolidation | 6/30/98 |
-- |