| | |
ARMY
CORPS OF ENGINEERS
The Army
Corps of Engineers (Corps) is assessing its workforce with the objective
of eliminating many non-core functions. Unfortunately, the Corps will
not meet the President’s goal for public-private competitions
until 2008. Although the Corps is on track to produce audited financial
statements, it needs to improve its management of information technology
projects and the quality of its performance measurement.
Initiative |
Status |
Progress |
Human
Capital — The Corps is rated green for progress because
the agency’s top leadership has recognized the need to focus
efforts in this area on improving the capability of the Corps
in skills needed to accomplish its core mission. The Corps will
use recruitment tools – like a website advertising Corps
employment opportunities – to address impending employee
departures. |
•
|
• |
Competitive
Sourcing — The current Corps plan indicates it does
not intend to meet the 50 percent competitive sourcing goal but
suggests it will compete 37 percent by 2008. The current plan
should expand the number of positions that would be subject to
competition. |
•
|
• |
Financial
Performance — The Corps did not receive a clean audit
opinion for 2001. It now is actively working with the DOD OIG
to resolve problem issues, including confirming the construction-in-progress
balances, which would allow for a clean audit opinion for 2003. |
•
|
• |
Enhancing
E-Government —
The Corps lacks an IT modernization blueprint. The Corps is developing
a blueprint and sound business cases for its major IT investments.
|
•
|
• |
Budget/Performance
Integration — The Corps has not developed acceptable
performance data for its program evaluations. It is working with
OMB to identify suitable performance measures, as a first step
toward collecting the outcome-based data needed to inform budget
decisions. |
•
|
• |
Program
Assessments
Five PART
analyses covering programs were completed that account for over 50 percent
of the Corps budget. While program management generally is effective,
the Corps needs to improve the long-term and short-term measures for many
of its programs.
|
|
|