SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
The President's Proposal:
-
Enhances program integrity initiatives to reduce payment errors;
-
Institutes new information technology initiatives to improve
customer access and expand the range of services offered to customers; and
-
Increases productivity in key work areas.
|
Social Security
Administration Jo
Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner
www.ssa.gov 800–SSA–1213
Headquarters: Baltimore, Maryland
Number of Employees: 63,464
2002
Spending: $492.7 billion
Field
Offices: 1,337
|
The Social Security Administration (SSA) promotes the economic security
of the nation through disbursing America's major income support entitlements
for the elderly, disabled, and their dependents. SSA manages the Old-Age,
Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) programs, universally known as
Social Security. SSA also administers the Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
program for low-income aged and disabled individuals. In addition, the agency
provides services that support the Medicare program on behalf of the Centers
for Medicare and Medicaid Services.
Administering
Benefits
SSA is responsible for paying around $40 billion in benefits to more
than 50 million people every month, processing more than five million new
claims for benefits each year, handling approximately 61 million phone calls
to its 800-number, and issuing 136 million Social Security statements. Other
activities include issuing Social Security numbers, maintaining earnings records
for wage earners and self-employed individuals, updating beneficiary eligibility
information, educating the public about programs, combating fraud, and conducting
research, policy analysis, and program evaluation. These activities are largely
integrated across the various programs that SSA administers.
The 2003 Budget includes resources to increase productivity in customer
service areas while also redeploying staff to front-line customer service
positions, thus improving performance in important areas as identified in
the accompanying table.
Performance Measurements
Goal | 2001 | 2002 | 2003 |
Percent of retirement claims
processed within 14 days | 83% | 85% | 88% |
Percent of SSA’s customer-initiated
services available to customers either electronically via the Internet or
through automated telephone service | 21% | 30% | 40% |
Percent of callers that access
SSA’s 800 number within five minutes of their first attempt | 92% | 92% | 94% |
The Ticket to Work program helps people with disabilities return to work.
 |
Services for Persons
with Disabilities. The
Ticket to Work and Work Incentives Improvement Act of 1999 was designed to
reduce barriers and increase incentives for individuals with disabilities
to participate in the workforce. Ticket to Work makes it easier for disability
beneficiaries to obtain employment services and lets them choose from a wider
array of service providers. The program also provides for cooperative agreements
and grant programs in each state for activities aimed at educating beneficiaries
about available employment support services and helping them understand the
work incentives built into the law. For example, one important incentive
gives Disability Insurance (DI) beneficiaries the opportunity to test their
ability to earn wages during a nine-month trial work period without affecting
their eligibility for benefits.
As part of his New Freedom Initiative, the President supported swiftly
implementing Ticket to Work. The program will be up and running in 13 states
this year. SSA will expand Ticket to Work to all states and U.S. territories
in 2003, and the program will be fully operational by early 2004. Over the
long run, Ticket to Work is expected to increase the percentage of DI and
SSI beneficiaries who are employed. Achieving this goal generates at least
a three-way benefit. First, the federal government sees benefit payments to
such persons drop. Second, the U.S. Treasury collects taxes on wages earned.
More importantly, though, the beneficiaries return to the dignity and independence
of work. The budget includes $40 million for SSA’s return-to-work activities
in 2003.
Stewardship
SSA conducts activities that at some point touch nearly everyone in
America—including issuing Social Security numbers, maintaining earnings
records that will later be used to calculate Social Security benefits, and
administering the benefit programs. As such, SSA has an obligation to ensure
sound financial management of its programs, as well as accurate and reliable
processes in other areas such as Social Security number issuance.
A crucial aspect of good management in income support programs is ensuring
that only eligible individuals receive benefits, and that they receive benefits
in the correct amount. SSA undertakes a variety of activities to minimize
improper payments through means such as verifying beneficiaries’ eligibility
status, collecting debt, and investigating and deterring fraud. Despite these
efforts, the SSI program, in particular, remains inherently vulnerable to
payment error and consequently has been designated as a high-risk program
by the General Accounting Office since 1997.
SSA has two major tools for ensuring payment accuracy: Continuing Disability
Reviews (CDRs) and SSI non-disability redeterminations. The first does what
its title implies to ensure that only those who remain disabled continue receiving
benefits. Redeterminations are used to assess whether an SSI recipient continues
to meet the financial eligibility requirements or has experienced a change
of circumstances that would affect his or her monthly benefit amount.
Detecting and Preventing Payment
Errors
. The
budget supports activities undertaken by SSA to ensure the integrity of records
and payments. The Administration proposes a total of $1.05 billion for conducting
CDRs and redeterminations for 2003. The amount for CDRs ($642 million) and
redeterminations ($411 million) will enable SSA to conduct CDRs on schedule
and increase the number of SSI redeterminations conducted by nine percent
over the budgeted 2002 level. This level of funding will allow SSA to conduct
almost 1.4 million CDRs and 2.5 million redeterminations in 2003. Approximately
two out of every five SSI recipients will receive a redetermination in 2003
with this level of funding. SSA targets its redetermination effort on cases
that are most likely to experience a change in eligibility, such as when a
beneficiary’s non-SSI income changes. SSA's experience shows $11 in
program savings for each $1 invested in CDRs and approximately $7 in program
savings from overpayments collected and prevented for each $1 invested in
redeterminations.
Protecting Social Security Numbers
. Social Security numbers (SSNs)
themselves have taken on added importance as the SSN has become widely used
as the key to a person’s identity. Firms request SSNs for such basic
activities as employment, opening a bank account, and applying for credit.
Their value motivates unscrupulous individuals to fraudulently acquire and
use them. To effectively reduce SSN fraud, SSA is reexamining its enumeration
process to improve its ability to assess whether individuals applying for
SSNs are who they say they are.
SSI Recipient Used Over
30 Aliases to Conceal His Identity
SSA’s Inspector
General investigated a man in 2001 who used multiple SSNs and identification
documents to obtain SSA benefits under various aliases. During searches,
investigators seized counterfeit identifications, SSN cards, and fake military
documents. The evidence showed the man used 33 or more aliases, was a five-time
convicted felon, and was a federal fugitive for 17 years.
The
man, a career criminal, at various times posed as a firefighter, traffic investigator,
animal control officer, Central Intelligence Agency agent, and U.S. Marine
Corps officer. At times, he portrayed himself as a highly decorated combat
veteran and former prisoner of war. He was incarcerated and ordered to pay
$56,900 in restitution to SSA.
|
SSA has gotten more sophisticated at preventing SSN fraud. Software
changes planned for 2002 and 2003 will interrupt the issuance of a card in
cases where suspicious circumstances exist. Nevertheless, vulnerabilities
remain, especially with regard to verifying some documents presented as identification.
Working in partnership with other federal agencies, SSA will remain at the
forefront of conquering any technological obstacles and institutional barriers
that provide an opportunity for fraud to occur.
Strengthening Social
Security For The Long Term
For more than 60 years, Social Security has provided retirement security
for tens of millions of Americans. Yet, Social Security itself is showing
signs of insecurity. Increasing life expectancies and falling birthrates have
combined to put the current system on a path to insolvency. Social Security
costs are projected to exceed annual cash revenues starting in 2016, and the
gap between costs and revenues will continue to grow thereafter. Between
2016 and 2038, Social Security trust fund “balances”—consisting
of debt the government owes itself—will make up the difference, although
all this means is that general tax revenues will increasingly be tapped to
pay benefits. After 2038, incoming Social Security revenue will only cover
73 percent of currently scheduled benefits.
The President appointed a bipartisan commission in May 2001 to develop
recommendations to modernize and restore fiscal soundness to Social Security,
based on the following principles:
-
Modernization must not change Social Security benefits for
retirees or near-retirees.
-
The entire Social Security surplus must be dedicated to Social
Security only.
-
Social Security payroll taxes must not be increased.
-
Government must not invest Social Security funds in the stock
market.
-
Modernization must preserve Social Security’s disability
and survivor components.
-
Modernization must include individually controlled, voluntary
personal retirement accounts, which will augment the Social Security safety
net.
In December, the President’s Commission to Strengthen Social Security
released its analysis of the financial problems confronting Social Security
and its recommendations for addressing them. The Commission determined that
reforming Social Security to include personal retirement accounts would lead
to better long run outcomes for future beneficiaries, the Social Security
program, and the economy as a whole.
Highlights of Commission Findings
Personal accounts would increase retirement
security because they would facilitate wealth creation for all participants.
Establishing personal accounts in Social Security would advance a highly progressive
principle: it would provide an opportunity for wealth creation to the approximately
half of American households who save nothing in an average year after contributing
12.4 percent of their wages to support the Social Security system. In addition,
personal accounts could add valuable protections for widows, divorced persons,
low-income households and other Americans at risk of poverty in old age.
Asset ownership would lead to improved financial
security by diversifying risk. Over the decades, lawmakers have
changed the Social Security benefit formulas and payroll tax rates numerous
times in response to fiscal conditions. Future Social Security benefit levels
remain uncertain due to the current projected funding shortfall in the program.
Social Security participants could hedge against this political risk by holding
some of their future retirement benefits in the form of personal accounts,
to which they would have a legal right of ownership. Workers could invest
their accounts as they saw fit, and those wishing to avoid market risk could
invest exclusively in government securities.
Commission to Strengthen Social Security:
Models for Reform |
Model 1. Future retirees who remain wholly in the
traditional Social Security system would potentially receive currently scheduled
benefits, subject to future actions to restore solvency. Expected benefits
for those who opt for personal accounts would be substantially higher. Option
to redirect two percent of payroll taxes to personal account, in exchange
for partial offset to defined benefit. No provision for additional revenues
or other measures to maintain solvency, so future benefit levels are uncertain.
Model 2. Future retirees who remain wholly in the traditional
Social Security system would receive defined benefits at least as high as
today's retirees in real terms. Expected benefits for those who opt for personal
accounts would be substantially higher. Higher benefits for survivors and
lifelong low-wage workers. Option to redirect up to four percent of payroll
taxes (capped at $1,000) to personal account, in exchange for partial offset
to defined benefit. Temporary transfers of general revenues to the trust funds
to maintain solvency.
Model 3. Future
retirees who remain wholly in the traditional Social Security system would
receive defined benefits higher than today's retirees in real terms, but less
than currently scheduled benefits. Expected benefits for those who opt for
personal accounts would be substantially higher. Higher benefits for survivors
and lifelong low-wage workers. Larger reductions for early retirement. Option
to redirect up to 2.5 percent of payroll taxes to personal account (capped
at $1,000), conditional on 1 percent out-of-pocket contribution (subsidized
for low-wage workers), in exchange for partial offset to defined benefit.
Additional federal revenues dedicated to Social Security indefinitely to
maintain solvency.
Benefit and Cost Projections
under the Three Models
Under all
three models, expected benefits would be substantially higher than those payable
with current-law Social Security revenues. The accompanying table compares
expected benefits and costs under the three models with currently scheduled
Social Security defined benefits, which are slated to grow in real terms for
future retirees because they are indexed to the average wage level. However,
currently scheduled benefits are uncertain after 2038 because the system is
underfunded. The cost of currently scheduled benefit obligations would exceed
Social Security revenues by $4.2 trillion over the next 75 years.
The
model benefit projections are not directly comparable to one another. For
example, while Model 1’s total benefits are higher than Model 2, the
Model 1 defined benefit is subject to considerable uncertainty because additional
actions would be required to maintain solvency. Models 2 and 3 each fully
fund the system. Model 2 provides an expected combined benefit higher than
currently scheduled benefits for most workers, at significantly less cost
to taxpayers than maintaining currently scheduled benefits under the existing
system. Model 3 benefits are higher than Model 2, because Model 3 explicitly
requires more federal revenues, as well as additional out-of-pocket account
contributions from workers that are not captured in the measure of federal
costs.
|
Comparison of Costs and Benefits of Currently
Scheduled Payments and Models for Reform
|
| Low Earner | Medium Earner | High
Earner | |
Currently
scheduled benefits, 2052 (2001 dollars) | New revenues
needed 1 |
| $986 | $1,628 | $2,151 | $4.2 trillion |
Change
in expected benefits, with account proceeds, 2052 2 | Change in new revenues
needed 3 |
Model
1 | +8.9% | +12.0% | +14.5% | +3.8% |
Model
2 | +15.0% | +2.4% | -4.4% | -45.0% |
Model
3 | +19.2% | +21.8% | +22.7% | -33.9% 4 |
1Represents present value of the net cash flow
required from the general fund over the next 75 years to pay currently
scheduled benefits. 2 Expected
percent change from currently scheduled benefits for new retirees in 2052.
Assumes accounts invested 50 percent equities, 50 percent bonds, purchase
of variable annuity upon retirement. 3 Represents
difference from the additional revenues that would be needed in any year simply
to meet currently scheduled benefits over the next 75 years. 4
Excludes
costs of out-of-pocket contributions and associated subsidy.
|
Partial advance funding should be a goal of
any effort to strengthen Social Security. Advance funding would
increase the nation’s capital stock and productive capacity. This would
increase the total economic resources available to support a large population
of retirees and would reduce Social Security’s financial burden on future
generations. Advance funding should occur through personal accounts rather
than government investment in private securities. Government investment would
likely lead to inappropriate political interference in the market, inefficiency,
and conflicts of interest.
A Social Security system with personal accounts
would offer higher total expected benefits to individuals than a system without
accounts, regardless of what other steps are taken to balance the system’s
finances. Personal accounts improve total expected benefits by
giving workers the opportunity to realize the gains that come from returns
on capital. The Commission presented three models for balancing Social Security’s
finances and incorporating personal accounts. The models differed with respect
to the extent to which they addressed Social Security’s fiscal imbalance.
Under each model, individuals with accounts invested in a standard portfolio
could expect higher total benefits than individuals without accounts.
Personal accounts can reduce the long-term cost
growth of Social Security, thus improving its fiscal sustainability.
Each of the reform models developed by the Commission would allow individuals
to redirect part of their payroll tax revenue toward a personal account.
In exchange for the opportunity to pursue higher returns, individuals would
agree to forego the defined benefit that would have been financed by these
payroll taxes assuming a low interest rate. As long as the personal account
earned a return higher than that interest rate, both the individual and the
Social Security system would come out ahead.
Social Security could be made fiscally sustainable
in a number of ways, all of which would require some combination of changing
the rate of benefit growth and committing additional revenues to the system
generated by taxation or by the proceeds of investment. In the
absence of personal accounts, the only choices are to increase taxes, slow
the scheduled growth of benefits, or some combination of the two. Whatever measures are ultimately taken to produce
a fiscally sustainable system, voluntary personal accounts improve the system
by offering individuals the opportunity to pursue higher expected returns
by investing in a low-cost, diversified portfolio.
Finally, the Commission recommended that the Congress and the President
engage in a period of national discussion for at least one year to carefully
consider the alternatives, as well as the consequences of inaction, and then
take the appropriate steps to strengthen and modernize Social Security.
The full text of the
Commission’s report is available at www.csss.gov.
Improving Performance
Service Delivery Assessment
The Commissioner of Social Security is committed to assessing the level
of service that SSA should be providing Americans, relate that to current
service levels, and determine the necessary action to reach service delivery
goals.
Disability Process Improvements
A long-standing management challenge for SSA has been
the time and expense involved in processing claims for disability benefits,
particularly appeals of unfavorable initial determinations. Initial claims
are processed by state employees at state disability determination service
agencies fully funded by SSA. In 2001, the average processing time for initial
claims was 106 days, or about three and a half months. For those whose claims
are denied, hearings are conducted by SSA’s Office of Hearings and Appeals
(OHA). Applicants requesting a hearing waited an average of another 10 months
in 2001 for OHA to return with a decision (see accompanying chart).
|
The disability determination process is inherently complex. It involves
the collection and evaluation of medical and other evidence from the claimant,
physicians, and sometimes from employers or other individuals who may have
information about the claimant’s impairments or ability to work. SSA
is exploring ways to automate the transmission and storage of case files,
but the process remains largely paper driven. Fragmentation across SSA’s
field offices, state agencies, and OHA also contributes to long processing
times.
SSA periodically has investigated ways to reduce disability processing
times. The most recent effort began in the mid-1990s and has not achieved
expected results. The number of disability claims is expected to rise substantially
in coming years, as the Baby Boom generation reaches the ages at which the
incidence of disability increases. It is imperative that SSA develop the
capacity to efficiently manage these workloads. SSA will examine potential
process reforms that would use administrative resources more efficiently and
improve management controls. The budget commits to reducing processing times
for initial disability claims by five days in 2003.
The budget also proposes a management improvement by establishing a
standard for accuracy in SSI disability awards identical to that which applies
to Social Security Disability Insurance.
Leveraging Technology
SSA anticipates moderate increases in its workloads over the next five
years and then considerable increases as the post-World War II Baby Boom generation
enters retirement starting in 2008. Unless SSA improves upon its current
business processes by investing in and making use of technology improvements,
resources may not be able to meet workload demands over the next 10 years.
When combined with procedural changes, exploiting the full potential of information
technology will allow SSA to handle the workload increases and improve customer
service without increases in staff.
21st Century
Communication.
SSA is developing a strategy to encourage citizens to interact with the agency
in the most cost-effective manner possible, particularly through the Internet
or SSA’s 800-number. SSA has made progress in recent years, especially
in its Internet presence. The agency has rapidly expanded the types of online
interactions that customers can conduct, such as filing claims for retirement
benefits over the Internet.
However, SSA remains a paper-driven agency. Only 3.5 percent of retirement
claims are handled over the Internet at this time, and other online services
also experience low utilization rates. SSA is developing aggressive outreach
efforts to educate SSA customers about their options and encourage them to
interact with the agency through electronic means when possible. Since there
are situations which require an in-person visit to a local field office, and
some customers prefer to conduct their business in person, the option to visit
a field office will remain available. However, most routine transactions
for those who have Internet access could be handled at lower cost to the agency
and greater convenience to the public through electronic means. SSA will
establish performance goals for the number of business transactions to be
conducted via the Internet and through automated telephone service. This
information will be included in performance and accountability reports as
a performance indicator.
SSA’s goal is to have 40 percent of customer-initiated services
available either via the Internet or through automated telephone service in
2003, rising to 67 percent by 2005. The President’s Budget provides
$688 million in 2003 for SSA information
technology, which will allow the agency to maintain its existing technology
infrastructure as well as expand its Internet services, improve security capabilities,
support electronic wage reporting by employers, and make a variety of other
improvements.
Strengthening Management
SSA
has made progress in implementing several components of the President's Management
Agenda. In the area of financial management, SSA has already eliminated many
of the serious deficiencies seen in most government agencies. Specifically,
SSA is one of only four agencies that has received unqualified opinions on
its financial audits since the agency first began submitting them in 1996.
The scorecard below establishes how SSA stood in 2001 against the standards
for success in each initiative. While the agency received one of the best
evaluations overall, there are areas for improvement. The plans to improve
management are identified in each of the management agenda sections.
Initiative | 2001 Status |
Human
Capital—SSA has reduced its supervisor to employee ratio
from 1:8 in 1990 to its current level of 1:14, which is one of the lowest
percentages of the 23 largest federal agencies. In addition, from 1990 to
2001, SSA increased the number of front-line workers by over 5,000 while its
workforce shrank two percent. However, given the expected future workloads
and the state of customer service, there is a compelling argument for additional
redeployment of staff to front-line positions. | • |
Competitive
Sourcing—While SSA identifies 19 percent of its workforce
as performing commercial tasks, there remain significant additional positions
to be classified as commercial. SSA will implement a management plan for
increasing competitive sourcing that identifies by function and location the
competitions or direct conversions to be conducted as well as a time line
for when and how they will take place. The management and competition plan
will describe the strategies used to ensure that at least five percent of
commercial positions will be competed or directly converted in 2002, and that
SSA will compete or directly convert at least 15 percent of the commercial
positions by 2003 to meet the Administration's two-year goal in a broader
effort to eventually compete at least 50 percent of all commercial activities.
| • |
Financial
Management—In 2001, SSA received an unqualified audit opinion
on its financial statements, and its accounting and internal control systems
met federal standards. However, SSA does not have fully integrated financial
and operating management systems, which support day to day decision making.
SSA is on track to integrating its financial and performance management system,
and will continue to integrate them through implementation of a new cost accounting
system in 2002.
Another key performance area is reducing erroneous
payments. The problem plagues the agency's Supplemental Security Income (SSI)
program, which remains a high-risk program due to improper payments. In recent
years, SSA has increased its funding for initiatives focused on identifying
erroneous payments. The 2003 Budget will enable SSA to increase SSI non-disability
redeterminations by nine percent and achieve a payment accuracy rate of 94.7
percent.
| • |
E-Government—SSA
has a broad strategic goal of attaining a paperless environment by 2010.
SSA has taken constructive steps in the last two years by rapidly expanding
online customer service options. These include retirement claims, Medicare
replacement cards, online “account” status, access to change one’s
address and telephone number, and direct deposit. Despite these new services,
SSA remains a paper-driven agency that still relies on moving claims folders
from one site to the next for processing. To address this issue, SSA will
give high priority to E-Government projects that will result in large productivity
increases by improving the business process, such as with the “e-dib”
project. This is a paperless process centered on employees sharing an electronic
folder in a secure environment to review disability beneficiaries' files.
SSA’s capital planning process has improved markedly
over the last two years. However, SSA will improve its risk management assessment,
set performance goals associated with specific information technology (IT)
projects, and develop a cost-tracking system that consolidates cost information
for IT projects.
| • |
Budget/Performance
Integration—SSA has a wide range of performance measures
for the various activities the agency conducts. However, SSA needs to strengthen
the linkage between performance and funding. Currently, SSA’s budget
relates funding to outputs, by calculating the workforce it needs to process
all of the work it expects to receive at given production rates, taking account
of planned efficiencies and other changes. Only in a few activities (Continuing
Disability Reviews and SSI Redeterminations) does SSA have costs specifically
aligned with outcome measures. SSA will improve its ability to present a
performance budget that permits direct comparisons between incremental budgeted
amounts and outcomes in specific activities. | • |
Social Security Administration
(In millions of dollars)
| 2001 Actual | Estimate |
2002 | 2003 |
Spending: | | | |
Discretionary Budget Authority: | | | |
Limitation
on Administrative Expenses (LAE) 1 | 7,448 | 7,907 | 8,283 |
Office of the Inspector General | 72 | 79 | 87 |
Research and Development | 23 | 30 | 23 |
Subtotal, Discretionary
budget authority adjusted 2 | 7,543 | 8,016 | 8,393 |
Remove contingent adjustments | -327 | -343 | -350 |
Total, Discretionary budget authority | 7,216 | 7,673 | 8,043 |
| | | |
Emergency Response Fund, Budgetary resources | — | 8 | — |
| | | |
Mandatory Outlays: | | | |
Old-age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance | 429,451 | 455,423 | 471,848 |
Supplemental Security Income | 27,481 | 31,322 | 32,469 |
Special Benefits for Disabled Coal Miners | | | |
Existing law | 486 | 454 | 420 |
Legislative proposal | — | — | -420 |
Special Benefits for Certain World War II Veterans | 7 | 9 | 9 |
Offsetting Collections | -1,692 | -1,368 | -1,880 |
Undistributed Offsetting Receipts | -7,910 | -9,243 | -9,564 |
Total, Mandatory outlays | 447,823 | 476,597 | 492,882 |
|
1 The LAE account includes funding from the
Hospital Insurance and Supplementary Medical Insurance trust funds for services
that support the Medicare program. |
2 Adjusted to include the full share of accruing
employee pensions and annuitants health benefits. For more information, see
Chapter 14, "Preview Report," in Analytical Perspectives. |
|