DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS
The
President’s Proposal:
-
Fulfills commitments to the nation's veterans by
-
guaranteeing that veterans’ disability claims are processed
accurately and quickly; and
-
improving health care delivery by coordinating the medical
care systems of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense.
-
Focuses medical care resources on treating disabled and low-income
veterans; and
-
Funds major expansion in cemeteries to prepare for increased
demands.
|
Department of Veterans
Affairs
Anthony J. Principi, Secretary
www.va.gov 202–273–4800
Number of Employees: 207,028
2002 Spending: $51.5 billion
Organization: Veterans Health Administration, Veterans
Benefits Administration, and National Cemetery Administration.
|
The Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) operates the largest direct
health care delivery system in the country; administers veterans’ benefits,
including monthly disability payments, education assistance, life insurance,
home loans, and vocational rehabilitation; and runs a nationwide system of
veterans' cemeteries while awarding other burial benefits.
Overview
Today, there are 25 million veterans, but
in the next 20 years this number will decline by one-third, to 17 million
(as shown in the accompanying chart). Although VA is charged with providing
services to the entire veteran population, fewer than one in five veterans
participate in VA programs. The decline in population ultimately will mean
that fewer veterans will seek medical care, monthly disability benefits, and
burials at VA cemeteries. However, on the immediate horizon, there will be
increased usage of some VA benefits and services, as veterans age and more
women draw on them. The imperative of recognizing veterans’ contributions
to the nation means that VA's strategy, business plan, and infrastructure
will need to adapt to ensure top-quality services and be flexible enough to
handle changing dynamics and waning population.
Status Report on Select Programs
The Administration is reviewing the management of programs throughout
the government. Poor performing programs that are not mission critical will
be eliminated, cut back, or reconfigured so that their funding can be redirected
to be more effectively used. The accompanying table rates the performance
of some of VA's most important programs. Those with ineffective ratings are
targeted for rapid improvement.
Program | Assessment | Explanation |
Disability and Pension Claims
Processing |
Ineffective
| VA systems and processes should be flexible to address an ever-changing,
demand-driven environment. VA is automating its existing processes slowly
but needs to identify and remedy the underlying causes of sluggish processing.
It must modernize its information technology capabilities. |
Care for Disabled and Low-Income
Veterans |
Ineffective
| VA’s medical care system’s ability to provide timely
and high-quality care to its core disabled and low-income veterans is being
jeopardized by the rapid increase of other veterans receiving VA care. |
Cemetery Benefits |
Effective
| The National Cemetery Administration strives
to provide high quality, courteous, and responsive service in all of its contacts
with veterans and their families. Of survey respondents, 92 percent rate
the services provided by the national cemeteries as excellent. However, improvements
can be made in cemetery system planning. |
Health Care Quality |
Effective
| VA is a recognized leader in health care quality
and has been at the forefront of innovations such as bar coding of prescription
drugs, computerized patient records, and medical error reporting. |
Medical Care Infrastructure Assessment
(CARES) |
Unknown
| VA has fallen eight months behind schedule on the first
of 22 regional studies, and it is yet unclear whether future studies will
benefit from correcting weaknesses identified in the first study. |
Guarantee that Veterans’ Disability Claims are Processed Accurately
and Quickly
I must say that I think the VA has
the necessary resources right now to do the job…the Agency can’t
justify asking for more people right now.
Vice Admiral
Cooper (retired)
Government Executive, November
8, 2001
|
One of the President’s top priorities is to make sure that when
a veteran submits a claim for a disability, it is processed quickly and accurately.
Disability benefits provide a monthly benefit to veterans who are disabled
as a result of their military service. Currently, 2.3 million veterans receive
these tax-free benefits. The amount awarded to a veteran depends on the severity
of the disability. For 2002, the basic monthly benefit ranges from $103 for
a 10 percent disability rating to $2,163 for a 100 percent disability rating.
Roughly half of veterans receiving compensation are less than 30 percent
disabled.
Improving the quality of life of the disabled is a national responsibility.
And yet, the time and cost of processing disability claims have steadily
increased. The average number of days to process a claim has risen from 100
days in 1996 to 181 days in 2001, and the number of claims awaiting a decision
has jumped from 343,000 to over 644,000 during that same period. Meanwhile,
the level of benefits paid increased by 27 percent in the past five years,
while the cost of administering these benefits more than doubled.
VA benefits help veterans lead active lives.
 |
There are three main reasons for continued poor performance. First,
the complexity of the claims has increased because veterans are requesting
benefits for more than one disability at a time. Second, laws and regulations
are passed with immediate start dates—giving VA no lead time to handle
the wave of new work required. Finally, VA has failed to effectively manage
its nation-wide system of benefit offices.
To handle a growing backlog of claims, VA
has repeatedly turned to hiring more and more employees. Since 1998, nearly
2,000 people have been hired to help process claims. Success, however, will
ultimately depend not on hiring new employees, but on the application of modern
information tools and, most of all, the establishment of true organizational
accountability.
In October 2001, Vice Admiral Daniel L. Cooper (retired), who led the
14-member Department of Veterans Affairs Claims Processing
Task Force, presented a final report to VA. The report concluded
that, as a result of basic flaws in organization and communication, VA is
unable to handle the effects of judicial decisions and legislative changes
on workload. Productivity is poor, and so far management has proven incapable
of introducing change and flexibility into the workplace.
VA should concentrate on radically changing the way it does business.
These changes include identifying practices that work best at VA and enforcing
their use across the country; allocating both work and funds to the best regional
offices; creating specialized processing centers; and developing a computer
system that allows people throughout the country to work on individual claims
at the same time.
The success of these initiatives must and will be measurable. Speed
should not come at the sacrifice of accuracy, or vice versa. VA will use
the following two critical performance measures to ensure that its efforts
are balanced:
-
Process disability compensation and pension claims in an
average of 165 days in 2003 (ultimate goal is 74 days—given the legal
and medical complexities and VA’s responsibility to help prepare claims);
and
-
Attain an 88 percent national accuracy rate for core rating
work in 2003 (ultimate goal is 96 percent)
To deliver services quickly and effectively, it is just as important
to establish a relationship between performance and resources, but VA has
not done this. The Department cannot, for example, say that for every $500,000
increase in funding, timeliness and accuracy improve by measurable percentages.
Until relationships like these are defined, it is impossible to figure out
the optimal amount of funding for veterans’ services.
Improve Health Care Delivery by Coordinating the Medical Care Systems
of the Departments of Veterans Affairs and Defense
Although VA and the Department of Defense (DoD) both operate very large
medical care systems with a combined cost of over $40 billion yearly, historically
there has been little cooperation between the Departments. The Departments
assert that the most common barriers have been different missions, patient
populations, and cultures, as well as differing opinions on who would lead
the effort. However, both Departments describe sharing efforts. Only $100
million—or one-quarter of one percent—of $40 billion in expenses
passes from one to the other.
Unnecessary Paperwork
All
veterans, by definition, were members of the Armed Services. While on active
duty their (and their families’) information was tracked by a system
that covered everything from security clearances, to health care entitlements,
to commissary privileges.
In an era of rapid high-tech changes,
the minute veterans want to apply for VA benefits, they must provide pages
of information on paper, that was already on computers at DoD. Likewise,
when these same veterans later apply for other VA benefits, they start the
process all over again.
|
Sharing information and technology can make a world of difference to
the military and veteran communities. It can speed up service, ensure veterans’
safety, and inform veterans of entitlements that they are due. In addition,
information sharing can transmit important knowledge through the departments’
walls—replacing the myth that they have little in common.
Failure to Communicate
Military
retirees can use both DoD and VA medical care systems. Today, many selectively
use both. When a retiree goes to VA for services one week and DoD the next,
serious errors can result if the doctors do not know what others have done.
Despite information sharing efforts within VA, if drugs ordered in each system
have adverse interactions, patients may become gravely ill or die.
|
In many communities, VA and DoD hospitals are close to each
other and offer similar services (e.g., primary care, surgery, or eye care).
However, traditionally neither has considered the other as an option in determining
construction or health delivery needs. In light of the new emphasis on sharing,
the DoD and VA are working together to solve mutual problems in the Greater
Chicago area, where currently there are five VA hospitals and one DoD hospital
as shown in the map. DoD needs more space and had plans to build a new hospital
within walking distance of a near-empty VA hospital. Now VA and DoD are planning
to jointly share this hospital and save a significant amount of money by reducing
construction of new buildings.
 |
The
lack of sharing resources and information also results in a waste of the taxpayers’
money. This has frustrated the Congress, which has mandated experimental
programs for sharing buildings and people. In addition, the Congress has
asked VA and DoD to work together to purchase drugs and other medical supplies
at a lower price, resulting in savings to the government.
Patient Transportation
If
a veteran needs to be moved long distances from one VA hospital to another,
he is typically transported via commercial airline. This is very expensive.
DoD routinely transports military patients in planes with unused space.
VA and DoD are negotiating how to put VA patients on DoD planes, thereby lowering
the cost to both departments.
|
President Bush made it one of his top priorities to coordinate the two
systems. Four areas have been identified as high-priority for coordination:
veteran enrollment; computerized patient records; cooperation on air transportation
of patients; and facility sharing instead of new construction. The President
established a task force that will make recommendations this year to improve
the coordination between the two Departments’ health care systems.
Moreover, the President’s Management Agenda includes an initiative
to increase coordination and delivery by VA and DoD of veterans' benefits
and services. Over the past year, VA and DoD have undertaken an effort to
improve cooperation and sharing in several areas by a reinvigorated VA/DoD
Executive Council.
Focuses Medical Care Resources on Treating Disabled and Low-Income
Veterans
A 1996 law, allowing VA to treat patients
in the most practical settings, changed the way VA delivers care to veterans
in very much the same way as the private sector changed. For example, the
Department now provides most of its care in clinics and homes instead of in
hospitals. This shift has allowed VA to spend its resources more effectively
and has provided patients with more convenient service. At the same time,
patients have also benefited from new innovative safety and quality systems.
Today, VA is recognized as a world leader in quality medical care.
 |
The same 1996 law also required VA to enroll veterans for medical care
in one of seven distinct priority levels. Veterans with military disabilities
or low-incomes are in the higher priority levels to preserve VA’s core
mission. All other veterans fall into the lowest level. The enrollment process
requires VA’s Secretary to announce, prior to the beginning of each
fiscal year, what priority levels of veterans are eligible to receive care
given the level of funding enacted into law. Each year since, VA has announced
that all veterans are eligible to receive care. When eligible for care, a
veteran is entitled to receive the full basic benefits package of services.
Prior to the 1996 law, veterans in the lowest priority level were only
treated on a space-available basis, and were restricted as to what care they
could receive and where they could receive it. However, since the law took
effect, these veterans have grown from two percent to over 21 percent of VA
patients as shown in the chart above. They have always been required to pay
for a minor portion of their care by the use of co-payments. But given their
rapidly escalating numbers, these veterans will consume a critical portion
of VA resources at the expense of the disabled, poorer veteran population
unless they are required to pay a greater portion of their care. The budget
proposes a new $1,500 annual deductible amount for these veterans, whereby
they would pay 45 percent of the charge until their out-of-pocket expenses
total $1,500.
Although VA has changed the way it provides care to veterans, its buildings
are relics of the past. VA’s buildings are not located where most veterans
live. Although many veterans have moved to the South and Southwest (where
waiting times for appointments have grown), VA still maintains underused hospitals
throughout the North and East regions of the country (where few seek such
services). The General Accounting Office (GAO) reported that VA was wasting
up to $1 million a day in keeping these hospitals operating. VA should be
expanding the number of clinics where disabled and low-income veterans are
living and converting many of its massive hospitals to more efficient clinics,
where needed. To do this, VA began a review process in the first of its 22
regions in the fall of 2000. This process is known as Capital Asset Realignment
for Enhanced Services (CARES). The contractor's recommendations were completed
June 2001, but VA has not yet decided how to proceed in the other 21 regions.
In addition, VA has not modified its contract methods to correct some deficiencies
identified in the first study. Savings identified will be used to provide
care to veterans in the same or other geographical areas.
Funds Major Expansion in Cemeteries to Prepare for Increased Burial
Demands
Over 90 percent of family members and funeral directors who have recently
received services from a national cemetery rate the quality of VA’s
burial services as excellent. By the end of 2002, VA will operate 120 national
cemeteries and over 40 VA-funded state cemeteries providing burial services
for almost 100,000 veterans and eligible family members per year. VA’s
goal is to ensure compassionate and good service, while searching for more
efficient ways of doing business. For example, kiosk information centers
are being placed in cemeteries to assist visitors in finding exact gravesite
locations. In addition, VA orders almost all headstones by computer to shorten
the waiting times for families.
VA cemeteries are rated excellent by almost all.
 |
Soon, VA will have a major challenge in determining the appropriate
number, location, and mix of national and state cemeteries as the veteran
population continues to decline and as deaths peak over the next decade (see
accompanying chart).
 |
One of VA’s key goals is to ensure that most veterans have a national
or state veterans' cemetery within 75 miles of their home. The recent opening
of several new cemeteries, with more on the way, has helped improve veteran
access to burial to 73 percent in 2001. Planned performance for 2003 is 76
percent. VA will never be able to accomplish 100 percent, nor should it.
It is not cost-effective to construct new national cemeteries in regions
with few veterans. Therefore, VA must reevaluate how best to economically
maximize caring for the largest number of deceased veterans and their families.
To date, though, VA has not defined the minimum number of veterans that national
and state cemeteries should serve before construction is justified. Nor has
the department suggested substitute benefits that might be appropriate for
veterans in under-populated areas.
Strengthening Management
Although VA has made some progress in addressing its financial performance
shortcomings, it has made little progress elsewhere. The Department is working
to develop a satisfactory plan to achieve the President's goals for competitive
sourcing, E-Government, and human resources. The scorecard below shows VA’s
2001 status on the President's management initiatives.
Initiative | 2001
Status |
Human
Capital—VA, like most other federal agencies, faces human
capital challenges when its aging workforce retires and leaves gaps in critical
skills such as disability claims adjudicators (where it takes several years
to train new employees in complex medical and legal skills). The Department
will revise its current plan to incorporate more detailed methods of tackling
this challenge with clear deliverables and deadlines. In addition, VA will
examine the different pay options it has available in order to ensure that
geographic shortages of critical medical care providers can be addressed. | • |
Competitive
Sourcing—Nearly half of all federal employees perform tasks
that are readily available in the commercial marketplace. The Department
is developing a plan to meet the Administration's goal of allowing the private
sector to compete commercial functions currently done by the government. | • |
Financial
Management—VA has persistent problems with internal controls,
which include nine material weaknesses, all of which have been carried over
from prior years. However, VA has developed a financial management plan to
address its problems, and is now moving towards implementing an acceptable
financial system. | • |
E-Government—Historically,
VA has made major information technology (IT) decisions without thorough analysis.
For example, the Department does not coordinate its planning and investment
processes, and does not fully develop its justifications for major IT projects.
It also lacks an enterprise architecture to make IT investment decisions.
In early 2002, VA will produce a timetable for completion of its enterprise
architecture. The department also is committed to providing qualified business
cases by March 2002. | • |
Budget/Performance
Integration—VA cannot monitor with sufficient precision
the cost and effectiveness of many of its programs. For example, VA used
the Hepatitis C crisis to argue for, and receive, $0.7 billion of additional
funding specific to this cause for the three years beginning with 2000. However,
VA has been unable to track the expenditure of this amount to Hepatitis C
care, to determine how and if the funding changed performance, or report on
how veterans have been served nationwide. While VA is working on a comprehensive
patient Hepatitis C tracking system, no plans to link this performance with
budget have been addressed. VA will present a timetable and plan to link
key performance goals throughout the Department with funding levels by June
2002. | • |
Department of Veterans Affairs (In millions of dollars)
| 2001 Actual | Estimate |
2002 | 2003 |
| | | |
Spending: | | | |
Discretionary budget authority: | | | |
Medical Programs: | 21,352 | 22,529 | 24,023 |
Medical Care | 20,920 | 22,071 | 23,537 |
Medical
Collections (non-add) | 771 | 1,051 | 1,489 |
Medical Administration | 69 | 74 | 77 |
Medical and Prosthetic Research | 363 | 384 | 409 |
Construction: | 361 | 523 | 536 |
Major Construction | 66 | 183 | 194 |
Minor Construction | 170 | 211 | 211 |
Other Construction | 125 | 129 | 132 |
Veterans Benefits Administration: | 1,049 | 1,166 | 1,408 |
Benefits Administration: | | | |
Existing Law | 883 | 998 | 1,039 |
Legislative Proposal | — | — | 20 |
Credit Administration | 166 | 168 | 172 |
VETS State Grant Awards: | | | |
Existing Law | — | — | — |
Legislative Proposal | — | — | 177 |
Other: | 401 | 439 | 479 |
General Administration | 235 | 253 | 278 |
General Administration (credit) | 4 | 5 | 5 |
Inspector General | 48 | 55 | 58 |
National Cemetery Administration | 114 | 126 | 138 |
Subtotal, Discretionary budget authority adjusted 1 | 23,164 | 24,657 | 26,447 |
Remove contingent adjustments | -789 | -831 | -891 |
Total, Discretionary budget authority | 22,375 | 23,826 | 25,556 |
| | | |
Emergency Response Fund, Budgetary resources | — | 2 | — |
| | | |
Mandatory Outlays: | | | |
Veterans Benefits Administration: | | | |
Compensation and Pensions | 21,420 | 24,905 | 26,421 |
Montgomery GI Bill Benefits | 1,623 | 2,235 | 2,569 |
Insurance | 1,231 | 1,287 | 1,315 |
Credit | 333 | 704 | 342 |
All other programs and receipt accounts | -1,923 | -2,181 | -368 |
Subtotal, Mandatory outlays | 22,684 | 26,950 | 30,279 |
| | | |
Credit activity: | | | |
Direct Loan Disbursements: | | | |
Veterans Benefits Administration: | | | |
Native American Direct Loans and Transitional Housing
for Homeless Veterans Loans | 2 | 3 | 15 |
Vendee and Acquired Loans | 1,470 | 1,815 | 1,922 |
Education and Vocational Rehabilitation Loans | 2 | 3 | 3 |
Subtotal, Direct loan disbursements | 1,474 | 1,821 | 1,940 |
Guaranteed Loans: | | | |
Veterans Benefits Administration: | | | |
Veterans Home Loan Program | 31,138 | 32,067 | 32,665 |
Subtotal, Guaranteed loans | 31,138 | 32,067 | 32,665 |
|
1 Adjusted to include the full share of accruing
employee pensions and annuitants health benefits. For more information, see
Chapter 14, "Preview Report," in Analytical
Perspectives. |
|