PROTECTING THE HOMELAND
Together, we will confront the threat of terrorism. We will
take strong precautions aimed at preventing terrorist attacks and prepare
to respond effectively if they might come again. We will defend our country;
and while we do so, we will not sacrifice the freedoms that make our land
unique.
President
George W. Bush October 8, 2001
|
Overview
Our nation learned a terrible lesson on September 11th—America
has evil, cold-blooded enemies capable of unprecedented acts of mass murder
and terror. The characteristics of American society that we cherish—our
freedom, our openness, our great cities, our modern transportation systems—make
us vulnerable to terrorism of catastrophic proportions. This vulnerability
will exist even after we bring justice to those responsible for the events
of September 11th.
Indeed, the threat of mass-destruction terrorism has become a reality of
life in the 21st Century. It is a permanent condition
to which not just America, but the entire world must adjust.
The federal government has an absolute obligation to secure the homeland
from future terrorist attacks. This will involve major new programs and significant
reforms by the federal government, several of which are described in this
budget. But it will also involve new or expanded efforts by state and local
governments, private industry, non-governmental organizations, and ordinary
citizens. The higher priority we all now attach to homeland security has already
begun to ripple through the land.
Homeland security is a challenge of monumental scale and complexity.
It will not be cheap, easy, or quick. Achieving our homeland security objectives
will require vast sums of money, strenuous labor, and many years. Our work
has already begun, and it will continue. The American people should have no
doubt that ultimately we will succeed in weaving a proper and permanent level
of security into the fabric of America.
This budget reflects not just our absolute commitment to achieving a
much more secure homeland, but also our determination to do so in a manner
that preserves liberty and strengthens our economy.
September 11th
and Our Response
The September 11th terrorist attacks on the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon have presented an unprecedented challenge
to our nation. The response has been, and must continue to be, equal to that
challenge.
In the immediate aftermath of the attacks, Congress swiftly appropriated
$40 billion to aid reconstruction, wage war against terrorism, and strengthen
our defenses at home.
Aftermath of terrorist attack on the World Trade Center.
 |
In the months since
September 11th,
the $10.6 billion of the $40 billion dedicated to homeland security purposes
has helped to:
-
dramatically increase the number of sky marshals riding on
our airlines;
-
support the largest criminal investigation in U.S. history;
-
acquire enough medicine to treat up to 10 million more people
for anthrax or other bacterial infections;
-
investigate the sources of terrorist funding, and then freeze
the financial assets of more than 150 in iduals and organizations connected
to international terrorism;
-
deploy hundreds of Coast Guard cutters, aircraft, and small
boats to patrol the approaches to our ports and protect them from internal
or external threats;
-
acquire equipment for certain major mail sorting facilities
to find and destroy anthrax bacteria and other biological agents of terror;
and
-
station 8,000 National Guards troops at baggage-screening
checkpoints at 420 major airports.
Now we will take the next step. When the President established a new
Office of Homeland Security, under the leadership of Governor Tom Ridge, he
directed the Office “to develop and coordinate the implementation of
a comprehensive national strategy to secure the United States from terrorist
threats or attacks.”
This strategy will meet four key tests:
-
The strategy for homeland security will be comprehensive and
will integrate the full range of homeland security activities into a single,
mutually supporting plan.
-
The strategy will be a national strategy, not a federal government
strategy. The threat posed by terrorism does not fall neatly within the jurisdiction
of the federal government. To defeat terrorism, the federal government must
work with states and localities and the private sector.
-
The strategy will commit the federal government to a long-term
plan and a long-term budget to improve homeland security.
-
Finally, the strategy will include benchmarks and other performance
measures by which we can evaluate progress and allocate resources. These objectives
will set the goals for federal departments and agencies. They will also give
guidance to state and local governments and the private sector.
At the same time as we craft our national strategy, we will begin work
immediately on four urgent and essential missions for the defense of our homeland:
-
ensuring state and local first responders (firemen, police,
and rescue workers) are prepared for terrorism;
-
enhancing our defenses against biological attacks;
-
securing our borders; and
-
sharing information and using information technology to secure
the homeland.
The President’s Budget for 2003, including Department of Defense
spending, provides $21 billion to fulfill these four missions. Including other
programs, total spending for homeland security would rise to $38 billion in
2003—an $18 billion increase over 2002, a virtual doubling of the pre-September
11th levels.
The task of homeland security, however, is extraordinarily broad. The
national strategy, therefore, will go well beyond these four initiatives.
The nation’s response to the terrorist attacks, although impressive
in many respects, revealed substantial shortcomings in our ability to prevent,
mitigate, and investigate such events. The sheer size and wealth of America
means that we present many targets to terrorists. Similarly, our freedom
and openness makes our society vulnerable. Terrorists can strike at any place,
at any time, with virtually any weapon. But America’s free and open
society has been challenged before and we can meet this new threat without
abandoning these fundamental American principles.
Mission One: Supporting First Responders
Local fire, police, and rescue workers are the first to arrive at catastrophes, such as the September 11th attacks.
 |
When disaster strikes, the
first people on the scene are our “first responders”— firefighters,
local law enforcement, rescue squads, ambulances, and emergency medical personnel.
These brave and dedicated men and women, many of them volunteers, are our
first line of defense when terrorists attack. More than 300 first responders
were killed in the September 11th attacks on the
World Trade Center and the Pentagon. While others ran out of burning, collapsing
buildings, they charged in, risking their own lives to save others.
In this war on terrorism against our homeland, first responders are
the infantry, protecting our lives and freedoms 24 hours a day. What they
do in the first minutes after an attack can mean the difference between life
and death for the terrorist’s victims. We ask much from them, and they
always deliver. Now it’s time to come through for them.
The President’s Budget provides $3.5 billion to support first
responders, a more than twelvefold increase over 2002. The funds would be
used to buy personal protective equipment, emergency medical equipment, biological
and chemical detection equipment, communications, and other items that local
first responders tell us they need. It would help first responders acquire
the latest technology and training that can shave critical minutes or hours
off of response time, but due to the cost may have been out of reach for many
localities. For example, this funding could be used to acquire diagnostic
test equipment that can reduce the time required to test for anthrax from
40 hours to a matter of minutes.
In the hours and days that followed the terrorist
attacks on September 11th, communications between
local police, fire, and rescue units and federal agencies providing assistance
was extremely unpredictable, and in some cases, virtually impossible. The
collapse of the two World Trade Center buildings knocked out antennas used
for cellular telephones, threatened emergency communications systems, and
damaged landline switches in nearby buildings. The limited interoperability
of emergency responders’ communications equipment, and the inherent
complications for line-of-sight communications in densely built-up Manhattan,
caused further problems. If rescue workers cannot talk to one another, they
cannot do their jobs.
|
The funds will also be used to conduct more frequent regional terrorism
drills and rehearsals, enabling first responders to work together and identify
gaps in their responses. The funds would be used to upgrade emergency communications
systems throughout the nation, enabling more first responders and their agencies
to talk with one another in “real time.” Finally, a portion of
this funding will be dedicated to a new Homeland Security Corps that will
be coordinated by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and be a
key component of the USA Freedom Corps.
The role of first responders, who are largely under state or local control,
is a reminder that our war on terrorism is a national, not a federal, effort.
Under the budget, first responders will have increased freedom to determine
their own needs and how best to meet them. FEMA will work closely with state
and local officials to ensure their planning, training, and equipment needs
are addressed. FEMA will also be charged with improving the federal government’s
coordination with state and local governments and reducing duplication within
federal agencies.
Mission Two: Enhancing Our Defense Against Biological Attacks
On October 4, 2001, a Florida man named Robert Stevens was diagnosed
with inhalation anthrax. The source of the anthrax attacks is still unknown.
But the effects of the attacks are clear: five people murdered; hundreds treated;
thousands tested; and a new American vulnerability laid bare. The consequences
of new, larger, more sophisticated attacks could be much worse. We must have
no illusions about the threat of germ terror.
We learned that we must strengthen effective means to detect and react
quickly to bioterrorism—and that a failure to do so endangers our people
and our nation. So the President’s 2003 Budget requests $5.9 billion
to enhance our defenses against bioterrorism, principally in the following
four major areas:
Disease has long been
the deadliest enemy of mankind. Infectious diseases make no distinctions among
people and recognize no borders. We have fought the causes and consequences
of disease throughout history and must continue to do so with every available
means. All civilized nations reject as intolerable the use of disease and
biological weapons as instruments of war and terror.
President George W. Bush November
1, 2001 |
-
First, the President proposes spending $1.2 billion in 2003
to increase the capacity of state and local health delivery systems to respond
to bioterrorism attacks. The largest share of this funding, $591 million,
would be provided to hospitals for infrastructure improvements such as communications
systems and decontamination facilities, comprehensive planning on a regional
basis to maximize coordination and mutual aid, and training exercises that
will help the public health and emergency response communities work together
better. The budget also includes $210 million for states to assess their
existing ability to respond to such attacks, and then strengthen their capacity
to do so. An additional $200 million would be used to increase state laboratory
capacity and related systems to permit rapid collection and identification
of potential biological agents.
-
Second, the President’s Budget includes an aggressive
$2.4 billion research and development program to develop technologies that
will strengthen our bioterrorism response capabilities in the mid- and long-term.
Almost $1.7 billion would be provided to the National Institutes of Health
to perform fundamental research leading to the development of vaccines, therapeutics,
diagnostic tests, and reliable biological agent collection, rapid identification
and monitoring technologies, and to create a safe and reliable anthrax vaccine.
Another $420 million is proposed for the Department of Defense (DoD) to study
the technology and tactics of bioterrorists and devise countermeasures to
the use of biological agents as weapons. The budget also includes $100 million
to improve security at the nation’s biological research laboratories
and $75 million for the Environmental Protection Agency to develop improved
techniques and procedures to cope with future biological or chemical incidents.
-
Third, the President’s bioterrorism initiative includes
$851 million to improve federal capabilities to respond to bioterrorist events.
The National Pharmaceutical Stockpile will contain a sufficient amount of
antibiotics to provide treatment for 20 million people by the end of 2002.
The budget includes $300 million to manage this stockpile, increase the supply
of chemical antidotes, and conduct the proper planning and training to ensure
that states can effectively receive and distribute stockpile allotments. It
also includes $100 million to improve our ability to distribute and effectively
use the nation’s supply of smallpox vaccine and $99 million for the
Food and Drug Administration to enhance the safety of the nation’s food
supply.
-
Fourth, the budget proposes spending $392 million to strengthen
our ability to detect and react quickly through improved communications to
a biological attack. A key component of this ability is information management
and exchange. The budget includes $202 million to create a national information
management system that links emergency medical responders with public health
officials, enables early warning information to be distributed quickly, and
permits emergency medical care and public health care providers to share diagnostic
and treatment information and facilities. The budget also includes $175 million
to assist state and local public health providers begin to acquire the necessary
hardware and assistance to access this information.
Mission Three: Securing Our Borders
America’s borders must be made secure—and they must remain
open. To achieve both these goals, the border system of the future must gain
a new ability to identify low- and high-risk traffic, speeding low-risk traffic
on its way, while focusing the attention of border security personnel on high-risk
traffic. Accomplishing this separation in a quick and reliable manner is an
enormously difficult task. It will require more sophisticated use of data
and close cooperation with private industry and other governments, especially
Canada, Mexico, and our other large trading partners.
As it is, nearly a dozen federal agencies are charged with patrolling
or inspecting along the border. The State Department issues visas. The Justice
Department’s Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) inspects them.
The Treasury Department’s Customs Service checks any bags the visa-holder
may bring with him. DoD and the National Guard patrol our skies. The Coast
Guard, which reports to the Secretary of Transportation, patrols our seas.
The Department of Agriculture regulates imports of food, the Commerce Department
monitors imports of manufactured goods, the Food and Drug Administration polices
imports of legal drugs, and the Drug Enforcement Administration tries to halt
imports of illegal ones. The intelligence agencies and the new Transportation
Security Administration have important roles as well.
This complex arrangement has evolved over many years, but thanks to
the dedicated professionals who staff it, often produces superb results—including
the thwarting of al Qaeda’s Millennium plot against American targets
in 2000.
All of the 19 September 11th
hijackers had entered the United States legally but three had overstayed legal
visas. The Immigration and Naturalization Service estimates that approximately
40 percent of persons currently in the United States illegally have overstayed
legally obtained visas.
|
Although border security has been strengthened as a result of the terrorist
attacks, the INS must do a better job of targeting illegal traffic while welcoming
legitimate travelers. Therefore, the President’s Budget includes $380
million to establish a reliable system to track the entry and exit of immigrants,
particularly those who might pose a security threat to the United States.
The new system will leverage advanced technology and construction funding
to ensure timely and secure flow of traffic. The Administration’s goal
is to complete implementation of this new, comprehensive initiative by the
end of 2004.
Additional funds will be spent to make passports and other documents
of North American nations more compatible with one another and more easily
read by one another’s computers—and to develop other identification
techniques to halt illegal entrants and speed and smooth the way for lawful
travelers and cargoes.
A car waits at an unattended northern border point of entry, blocked only by orange traffic cones in the middle of the road.
 | The
northern border, in particular, has become an attractive route for potential
terrorists. Until very recently, many northern entry points into the United
States were not staffed around the clock; entry into the United States was
sometimes controlled by no more than orange cones in the middle of the road.
Such measures stop only honest people.
Ending this vulnerability is an urgent priority that must build on the
long history of cooperative border management between the United States and
Canada, partners in the largest trading relationship in the world. In December
2001, the United States and Canada declared a mutual commitment to create
a “smart border” that could safeguard against terrorist activity
while ensuring the free flow of people and goods. The President’s Budget
provides funds to implement this agreement.
The President’s Budget would more than double the number of Border
Patrol agents and inspectors across the northern border. It supports deployment
of force-multiplying equipment, including remote operated infrared cameras,
to monitor isolated areas where illegal entry may have once occurred. The
budget also provides resources to integrate once-separate information systems
to ensure timely, accurate, and complete enforcement data is available in
the field.
Mission Four: Sharing Information and Using Technology to Secure the
Homeland
After September 11th, it became evident
that important information about the hijackers’ activities was available
through a variety of federal, state, and local databases. It also became clear
that there is no comprehensive system for sharing information relevant to
our security across jurisdictional lines.
The President’s Budget proposes $722 million for improvements
to information-sharing within the federal government and between the federal
government and other jurisdictions.
These improvements are often highly technical—and yet are crucial
to the successful protection of our society from terrorist attack. Technology
investments will improve the performance of agencies in preparing for, detecting
and responding to homeland security threats. So we will:
-
ensure that federal agencies with homeland security responsibilities
have needed access to threat information throughout the federal government;
-
establish a process to provide for appropriately secure communications
with state and local officials so they may receive homeland security information
in a timely manner;
-
ensure that crisis communications for federal, state, and
local officials is reliable and secure; and
-
unify federal government security and critical infrastructure
protection initiatives, and make strong security a condition of funding for
all federal investments in information-technology systems.
Sheikh Omar Abdel Rahman, the “blind sheikh” involved in
the 1993 car bombing of the World Trade Center, not only entered the United
States legally but was granted permanent resident alien status despite a terrorist
past that dated to the assassination of Egyptian President Anwar Sadat. Improved
information-sharing could make a repeat of such tragic mistakes unlikely.
Other Initiatives
These four missions lead our homeland security agenda—but they
are not the whole of it. We must also finish the job of securing our airways.
In 2003, the new Transportation Security Administration (TSA) will strive
to meet the tight deadlines and rigorous aviation security requirements set
by Congress. The TSA is responsible for screening passengers and baggage
at each U.S. airport with commercial air service. The budget requests $4.8
billion for TSA, a 210 percent increase on aviation security over 2002. It
includes funds to:
-
complete the hiring of approximately 30,000 new federal airport
security workers to check passenger identities and inspect carry-on and checked
baggage;
-
accelerate the installation of explosive detection technology
so that all baggage loaded in aircraft is safe; and
-
implement other measures to enhance passenger safety and facilitate
air travel.
We also propose a robust expansion in domestic law-enforcement work.
The Attorney General has instructed all department bureaus to shift their
primary focus from investigating and prosecuting past crimes to identifying
threats of future terrorist acts, preventing them from happening, and punishing
would-be perpetrators for their plan of terror. The 2003 Budget requests
enhancements to the capabilities of the FBI and other law enforcement/intelligence
agencies. These enhancements will:
-
enable the FBI to add more than 300 agents and other investigative
staff to the surveillance of terrorists and collection of information about
their activities;
-
add more than 15 investigators to the Foreign Terrorist Asset
Tracking Center (FTAT), to identify and close down the sources of money that
supports the terrorist cells. FTAT and the Office of Foreign Assets Control
work together to seize the terrorists’ assets; and
-
add approximately 150 FBI special agents and investigative
staff to the task of protecting our banking, finance, energy, transportation,
and other critical systems from disruption by terrorists, including by cyber
attack.
We face new kinds of threats from new kinds of enemies. Defeating those
threats will be the great challenge and the great achievement of this generation
of Americans.
The Homeland Security Budget |
To
develop the homeland security budget, the Office of Homeland Security and
the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) identified those activities that
are focused on combating and protecting against terrorism and occur within
the United States and its territories. Such activities include efforts to
detect, deter, protect against and, if needed, respond to terrorist attacks.
As
a starting point, funding estimates for these activities are based on data
that has been reported since 1998 in OMB’s Annual
Report to Congress on Combating Terrorism, and include combating
terrorism and weapons of mass destruction (WMD), critical infrastructure protection
(CIP), and continuity of operations (COOP) .
In addition, homeland security includes
funding for border security (i.e., Immigration and Naturalization Service’s
enforcement and detention activities, Customs’ enforcement activities,
Coast Guard’s enforcement activities, the Agricultural Quarantine Inspection
Program, and State’s visa program) and aviation security.
Since homeland security focuses on activities within the
United States, estimates do not include costs associated with fighting terrorism
overseas; those costs are captured within the war on terrorism abroad category.
The budget uses the Combating Terrorism Report’s
definitions for combating terrorism and WMD preparedness, CIP, and COOP.
Combating terrorism includes both antiterrorism (defensive measures used
to combat terrorism) and counterterrorism (offensive measures used to combat
terrorism), and includes the following five categories of activities as they
directly relate to such efforts:
-
law enforcement and investigative activities;
-
preparing for and responding to terrorist acts;
-
physical security of government facilities and employees;
-
physical protection of national populace and national infrastructure;
and
-
research and development activities.
CIP
is defined as efforts associated with enhancing the physical and cybersecurity
of public and private sector infrastructures, especially cyber systems that
are so vital to the nation that their incapacitation or destruction would
have a debilitating impact on national security, national economic security,
and/or national public health and safety.
COOP
refers to the capability of federal agencies to perform essential functions
during any emergency or situation that may disrupt normal operations.
As the Office of Homeland Security develops a comprehensive
national strategy to secure the United States from terrorist threats or attacks,
it may refine the definition used to establish the boundaries of this category.
|
|