The White House, President George W. Bush Click to print this document

For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
November 17, 2003

Interview of the President by Trevor Kavanagh of "The Sun"
The Oval Office
November 14, 2003

9:31 A.M. EST

THE PRESIDENT: Have you ever been in the Oval Office before?

Q Once, just once --

THE PRESIDENT: Okay. The rug was designed by my wife. Every President gets to design his own rug. You probably didn't know that.

Q Fabulous.

THE PRESIDENT: I wanted mine -- mine was designed by my wife, Laura. And I wanted people to have a sense of optimism when they came in here, that this is a guy who kind of sees a better world, not a worse world. Sometimes the Oval can be foreboding, and I wanted it to be cheery. So I hope you felt that.

This is called, "A Charge To Keep," it's based upon a Methodist hymn. One of America's great imports from England was John Wesley. And it talks about serving something greater than yourself, which speaks to my own personal faith; as a President, it speaks to my need to capture the spirit of America and call on people to serve. You've probably followed some of my domestic policy, but one of the things that's important is to call on people to serve their communities by helping neighbors who hurt. The de Tocquevillean view of America at that point was just, kind of, a civic fabric of loving organizations; part of my vision, as well, is to energize them.

The paintings of Texas. That's kind of what my ranch looks like, by a guy named Onderdonk, he's a Texas landscape artist. The blue bonnets are not quite that big. Blair and I -- well, he's been there, and he would recognize kind of the look, if he were here. This is West Texas, where my wife's family was raised. We were both raised in West Texas, but this is farther west than where I was raised. It's called El Paso. But it's a famous Texas artist and historian who painted that.

More Texas. The reason I have Texas up there is it's where I'm from. And in this job if you can't figure out who you are -- you better know who you are because of the pressures and the decision making process and all the noise of politics and all that (inaudible).

Really quickly, this is a desk given to us by Queen Victoria. A famous desk called the HMS Resolute, and it's wood from the Resolute. The door was put on by Roosevelt to cover his infirmities. Out of the door poked John Kennedy's son --

Q Oh, yes, I remember.

THE PRESIDENT: I chose to use this -- Ronald Reagan put the bottom on to make the desk high so it won't bump your knees. I love the desk. I love its history. It does speak to the great relationship between America and Great Britain, I'm sitting at a desk given to our country by Queen Victoria.

And, finally, the Churchill bust is on loan from the Brits. Tony Blair knew I was a great admirer of Churchill, so here he sits, along with Lincoln and Eisenhower.

That's it, welcome.

Q Fantastic. Thank you very much, Mr. President. Where would you like me?

THE PRESIDENT: Sit right here, take Vice President Cheney's seat.

Q I'm more than a little impressed by being here and by sitting in this seat.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, you know, this is a shrine to democracy and we treat it as such. And it's an honor to serve here.

Q Well, I would like to thank you on behalf of our readers for giving them and me the time to talk to you.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I'm glad you're here, thanks.

Q We're a very pro-American newspaper, and our readers were shocked and deeply moved by September the 11th. And they supported what happened subsequently in Afghanistan, and a little more reluctantly in Iraq, but, in fact, the majority of our readers were behind the action.

I think what they would like to know -- we've talked with them in a way which is quite interesting, we actually spent a weekend with about 2,000 of our readers.

THE PRESIDENT: Really? (Laughter.) Good marketing tool. (Laughter.) That's interesting.

Q Yes. And the one question they wanted to ask you is, is the world a safer place after the conflict than it was before?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, much safer. It's safer for a couple of reasons. One, the free world has recognized the threat. In order to make the world safe you've got to actually see reality. And the reality is that there are cold-blooded killers who were trying to intimidate, create fear, create hostility and to shape the will of the civilized world.

And a lot of countries have seen the threat for what it is. So, therefore, step one is recognizing the problem. Tony Blair recognizes the problem, Jose Maria Aznar recognizes the problem, Silvio Berlusconi recognizes the problem -- clearly, the United States recognizes the problem, after all, the clearest indication that we were at war and that the stakes had changed dramatically was September the 11th. After all, we were a country which was able to sit back in our -- kind of in our geographical posture and pick and choose where a threat might emerge and say, we may have to deal with that or we may not deal with it; we were pretty confident that we were protected ourselves by oceans. That changed.

And one of my vows to the American people is I won't forget the lessons of September the 11th, 2001.

Secondly, the world is safer because the actions we have taken will ultimately strengthen multi-national institutions. Take the theater in Iraq. The United Nations had recognized that Saddam Hussein was a threat, they recognized it in not one resolution, but multiple resolutions -- and, yet, didn't do anything about it. And, therefore, the resolutions became weak, became just words.

And as a result of enforcing 1441, which said that you disarm or there will be serious consequences, now when multi-national institutions speak, hopefully, people will take them seriously. And in order to win the war on terror, there needs to be alliance and cooperation. Because these are killers that are capable of hiding in societies, they're patient, they're lethal, they pop up and will destroy. And, by the way, they don't care who they destroy. There are no rules for these people, they will kill children just as soon as they'll kill somebody in a military uniform.

Thirdly, the world is safer because there is a -- and, by the way, multi-national forum doesn't necessarily mean U.N. It can also mean collaborations, like the collaboration that's now taking place with North Korea in dealing with Kim Jong-il, who is a threat to peace. And now it's not just the United States dealing with Kim Jong-il, it's the United States, China, South Korea, Japan and Russia in a collaborative effort. Or the fine work -- the initial fine work done by the foreign ministers of Great Britain, France and Germany in telling Iran to get rid of its nuclear ambitions. I say "initial fine work" because the Iranians, in the past, have had clandestine operations. And, therefore, in order to make sure that the words that have been issued to them are true, there must be transparency.

Fourthly, we dealt al Qaeda. We are tough on al Qaeda. Now, you know, there are key figures still looming in caves and remote regions of the world, but we're dismantling them. If you were to look at al Qaeda as a business organization, middle management is no longer. That's not to say that they're not grooming junior executives to take over certain roles. But we're tough and we're on their trail and we're still hunting them down. Make no mistake about it. And as a result of dismantling al Qaeda, the world is safer.

We've also dealt with the tyrants in Afghanistan, which is an incredibly dangerous regime -- dangerous not only to the free world because they provided housing, training, money, safe haven -- but also they were just tortuous and barbaric to their own people. And in Iraq, Saddam Hussein was clearly a threat to peace. And we can argue about the definition of "serious consequence," and I respect the debate, but no one can justify this man's behavior to his people. We've discovered mass graves with over 300,000 people there, rape rooms and torture rooms. He is paying suiciders to go kill innocent Israelis. He had a weapons program as discovered -- I promise you this is going to be a short answer, eventually; I saw you looking at the clock, your glance can't escape me. (Laughter.)

This is an important question. It is the question.

Q Of course, absolutely.

THE PRESIDENT: David Kay discovered a weapons program that was in material breach of 1441. In other words, it was in violation of precisely what the United Nations had asked him not to do. Saddam Hussein, in 1991, it was assumed that he -- his nuclear weapons program would be active in the out years and, in fact, the inspectors discovered he's got nuclear ambitions, not only real and active, but his program was a lot farther along than we thought. And had he ever developed a nuclear weapon, had he been allowed to have a nuclear weapon, he would have been the ultimate source of international blackmail.

And so the removal of Saddam Hussein makes the world safer. And, as importantly, the removal of Saddam Hussein gives the Iraqis a chance to live in freedom, which is the ultimate -- freedom is the ultimate route to security. I strongly believe that free nations are peaceful nations. Free nations are not terrorist havens, do not become terrorist havens. Free nations won't create conditions of strife and resentment that breeds anxiety and terror.

And, therefore, the world is becoming safer, is safer and will be even more safe when Iraq becomes free. And Iraq will be free, and it'll be peaceful. And we need peace and freedom in that part of the world.

Now, there's an interesting debate going on as to whether or not people, like the Iraqis, will ever adapt the habits of freedom. There's kind of an elitism that takes place -- in our country, in your country and elsewhere, feels, well, certain people can't be free, they can't adapt the habits of democracy. I strongly disagree. I strongly disagree.

And so, yes, the world is safer and the world is more peaceful.

Q Okay. That answer will resonate with our readers. Nonetheless, there is concern about the events, particularly in the last week or so, when things have escalated. I think this causes concern everywhere. Are we going to increase military presence there? Are we going to pull out? There's a fear that --

THE PRESIDENT: You don't have to worry about us pulling out.

Q There's a famous t-shirt, slogan, which shows the American flag and the words, "these colors don't run." Do you stand by that?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, absolutely. Absolutely. Our will is being tested. See, the tactics of the terrorists is to kill as many innocent people as possible and, therefore, try to shape the will of the Iraqis. As progress is made -- and we're making interesting progress, and I'll cite some examples in a minute that I think are fascinating. But as the Iraqis begin to say, wait a minute, life can be better, and their instincts kick in about what it means to live in a free society, the terrorists want to shake that. They want to scare them. They want the police not to become police. And we've got over 118,000 people now, Iraqi citizens in uniform beginning to conduct operations for their own security.

They, of course, want to kill our own soldiers, and, therefore, try to shake the will of the American people and the President and the command structure. They killed those Italians. And they were hoping that Berlusconi would say, oh, my goodness, this is too big a fight, we'll leave. We're not leaving. We're staying there to get the job done. Of course we mourn the death of any citizen. But I recognize that it is -- I still remember the death, what happened to us on September the 11th, as well. I was there at Ground Zero right after the attacks and I remember this kind of haze and the smells and the death and destruction. I'll always remember that, of course.

And, as I've told you, I vowed not to forget the lessons.

Q That changed everything?

THE PRESIDENT: Absolutely. Look, what changed for me was sitting on Air Force One and getting the reports that we were under attack. And I made up my mind then, right then, that we didn't need a bunch of legal briefs, I didn't need a bunch of -- you know, let's kind of hold hands and hope to get the right answer -- we were at war and we were going to win the war. And I still feel that same exact determination today that I did then.

Q So you'll stay in Iraq even --

THE PRESIDENT: We will do our job.

Q -- after there's an interim council, a government which is --

THE PRESIDENT: Yes. There's a lot of talk right now about the political process, as there should be. And we are interested in the Iraqis assuming more responsibility on the political side and on the security side. And a political process in which the Iraqis assume more responsibility will make the security side come together quicker, as well, in our judgment.

And, therefore, Bremer came here, he took instructions back from me to talk to the Governing Council to find out what is feasible when it comes to the passing of more power to the Governing Council. That's where we are right there.

On the security side, absolutely we're there. The goal is for Iraq to be peaceful and free. I understand the consequences of a free and peaceful Iraq in the midst of the Middle East. We can have the debate all day long as to whether the Middle East will ever adapt the habits of democracy and freedom. I think they will, obviously; and I'm confident they will. I like to tell people in this country, freedom is not America's gift to the world, freedom is not Great Britain's gift to the world, Freedom is the Almighty's gift to everybody in the world.

Q And this is what you'll tell the demonstrators? Or this is what you would tell the demonstrators if you had five minutes with them?

THE PRESIDENT: Of course I would, absolutely. I will say, you may disagree with our tactics -- nobody likes war, war is my last choice -- if the demonstrators are there as anti-war protestors; they may be there for other reasons, as well, global trade, and I'd be glad to talk to them about that, as well. But in terms of war, I can understand why people are anxious about war. I can understand why citizens in Great Britain, protestor or not, wonders about why a President would commit to war. Because nobody likes war.

On the other hand, I would tell them, the skeptics and the critics, that I have a job to protect the security of the United States of America, and that Saddam Hussein was a security risk, as witnessed by the international community speaking loudly on that subject 12 different times. But I would tell those who doubt our policy that we share a common goal, which is peace, and that free societies are peaceful societies. They may say, well, you can't possibly expect a country like Iraq to be free -- and then we'd have an interesting, philosophical debate, because I believe freedom exists in the heart of every single human being. It may take longer for people to accept freedom, if they've been tortured and brutalized like Saddam Hussein did.

Secondly, I would tell the skeptics that not only is the world more secure as a result of the decisions we made, the Iraqi people now have a chance to live in a society which is hopeful and optimistic, a society in which you're able to speak your mind, a society in which you don't have to pay homage to a brutal tyrant and his two brutal sons -- which is precisely how they had to live in the past.

Q So how do you respond to those people who were polled by the Europe commission and found that America was alongside Iran, North Korea is the second most powerful threat to world peace?

THE PRESIDENT: You just have to tell them watch what happens. The world is going to be more peaceful and the free world will be more secure as a result of the decisions we've taken.

Q Can I ask you about the special relationship, the role the British soldiers play in Iraq and are still playing?


Q Would you like to tell me about you feel about our contribution?

THE PRESIDENT: Yes, I'll tell you about your troops. They are well trained, they are well motivated and they're really good at what they do. And our soldiers and our generals and our commanders really appreciate being side-by-side with the Brits. They trust them, and that's important.

Secondly, in Basra, the Brits have brought an interesting strategy in dealing in Basra because you have dealt in Northern Ireland. In other words, it was kind of a transfer of experience that has been incredibly useful and important. I am really proud of our -- not only our alliance, because it's close now and I intend to keep it that way. I've got a great personal relationship with Tony Blair.

Let me tell you something about him just real quick, because it relates also to the trust of the troops. He's a man who comes in here and he says he's going to do something, and as I said -- as they say in Texas, you can book him when he says he's going to do something, you can take it to the bank. Because every time he has said something, he has done it, and I appreciate that a lot. It's not always the way it is in politics -- whether it be domestic or international politics. Sometimes they'll come and look you in the eye and say, "Oh, don't worry, Mr. President, we're with you and behind you," and it turns out they're way behind you, you can't find them when the heat gets on. But that's not the way Tony Blair is, and that's not the way the Brits' command structure is, and that's not the way the soldiers in the field have been. They've been tough and capable.

And decent people. That's the other thing about militaries, both our militaries are full of compassionate people. Because not only are we chasing down people and bringing them to justice, as we say, but there are schools being built, orphanages being opened, hospitals being supplied, thanks to compassionate British troops, and American troops, as well, and other troops. It speaks to the honor of our respective militaries, these are honorable people.

Q You're going to speak to some of the families of those who have already died in Iraq, and also September the 11th.


Q You're going to see them, I guess, on Downing Street.

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I'm not sure exactly where, but, you bet, I am going to see them.

Q What are you going to say to them?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I'm going to first of all ask for God's blessings, because I understand how bad they hurt. I can't imagine what it would be like if I were a mother or a dad to have lost a child. I'm a proud dad, it's got to shatter a person's heart to lose a loved one. And I will do the best I can to provide some comfort. I have done this here in America, as well. It's part of my duty as the leader of this country to comfort those who have sacrificed.

I'll also explain to them as best as I can that the sacrifices that their loved one has made is for a noble cause, and that's peace and freedom. I strongly believe that what we're doing today will make it easier for this person's grandchild to grow up in a free world and a peaceful world.

I'll tell you an interesting story, kind of dawned on me a while ago. I was talking to Prime Minister Koizumi of Japan in Tokyo -- we were having dinner, actually. And I kind of reflected on what it would be like -- during our dinner, I reflected on what it would be like if America and the allies hadn't done a good job in post-World War II, would I be sitting with a Prime Minister of Japan, with whom I've got great relations, talking about how to deal with Kim Jong-il and North Korea? It's an interesting thought.

Q Very interesting.

THE PRESIDENT: Beyond that is whether or not somebody 50 years from now is going to be sitting with a leader from Iraq, or any other country in that region, saying, "Thank goodness George W. and Tony Blair held the line, because I'm now able to deal with terrorist threats or potential terrorist threats with an ally; I'm able to help bring more peace to the world."

Presidents and Prime Ministers should never worry about their short-term history, how they're viewed in short-term history. There's no such thing as short-term history, except for the musings of somebody who's not very objective to begin with. Because if you set big goals and work on big items, the President or the Prime Minister won't be around to see the effects of those policies. And, therefore, I don't worry about the short-term history. I think in terms of long-term history I know what we're doing now is going to have an effect, a positive effect on this world.

Q Can I just backtrack a little?


Q You were talking earlier about the contributions countries like Britain and Italy have made and others.

THE PRESIDENT: Spain, Poland, a lot of people.

Q You didn't mention France and Germany in that -- you seem very critical of France.

THE PRESIDENT: Look, my attitude is the past is there, it's past, and now let's go on. I'll tell you one example of why that attitude is important, and that is Germany's contribution in Afghanistan. And it's a positive contribution -- more than positive, it's incredibly helpful. They've got a number of troops there. It's the first deployment of German troops, as I understand, outside of their soil since World War II. It's a positive -- yes, I think that's right, check the facts. But, anyway, it's helpful, really helpful.


THE PRESIDENT: Yes, NATO is important.

Q But France is a semi-detached member of NATO --

THE PRESIDENT: Well, it's a historic role --

Q They won't be a rival --

THE PRESIDENT: I certainly hope not. See, there's no need to rival the United States and our friends. Our goals are peace.

Q But France wants to counter.

THE PRESIDENT: You mean multi-polarity? Well, I think we need to work against multi-polarity, and the reason why I know we need to work against multi-polarity is a Europe working with American can do a lot together. A united Europe working with America can do a lot together. We can promote peace. We can fight off terror, which is necessary, and there needs to be full cooperation in order to defeat the terrorists. We can work on issues like global AIDS.

I'm real proud of our country's contribution to global AIDS. Just to give you a sense of my feeling on this, we are a fortunate country. We're prosperous -- and by the way, we're becoming more prosperous, which is good news.

Q I'd like to ask you about that.

THE PRESIDENT: Okay. But I believe we owe a lot to the world's peace and we owe a lot to those who suffer, because of our fortune, because of our wealth. I'm proud of the fact that Congress has supported my initiative to provide a large sum of money. And, as importantly, I'm proud of our NGOs and faith-based organizations that are willing to help provide the infrastructure so that we can get help to beat this pandemic. We're a prosperous country, and yet in our world an entire generation is about to be wiped out. And I feel strongly about America's need to be involved and Europe's need to be involved in this issue, together, just like I feel strongly we need to provide food for the hungry, just like I feel strongly that when we see tyranny, that we need to work for freedom.

Every situation, of course, doesn't require military action. I just repeat -- I want your readers to know, the military is my last choice, not my first choice. See, I understand the consequences of war. I understand the risks of war. I understand firsthand, particularly when I go and hug the moms and dads and brothers and sisters and sons and daughters of those who died.

I also see the consequences of not acting, of hoping for the best in the face of these tyrannical killers. So, therefore, our foreign policy will be active, we'll work closely with our friends and allies, and we're going to stay on the offensive against the terrorists.

Q Let me just ask you one quick question on the economy.


Q It's going great guns. You're revising figures upwards. You introduced tax cuts. You promised tax cuts, you introduced them. Is this a message to the rest of the world, too?

THE PRESIDENT: Well, I think people ought to look at pro-growth policies and how to stimulate the entrepreneurial spirit. To me, one of the unique qualities of our country is the individualism of our country and the willingness of people to take risks to better themselves. Most new jobs in America are created by small businesses, and that's an exciting aspect of our economy, because it not only is good economics to have the job hiring dispersed throughout society, it also is such a hopeful part of our economy. When you think about somebody in America can start their own business and grow it, and then actually own something. They become the owner of this piece of property.

Our tax policy was very effective at stimulating small business growth, because most small businesses pay tax at the individual income tax level. When you hear small business or small corporation, you think, corporate tax. But in America most small businesses are sole proprietorships or Subchapter S's, so that when we cut all rates -- not trying to select rate cuts, but all rates -- it really affected capital formation in the small business.

This economy, and this country, more importantly, is tough and resilient. We've been through a lot. When I showed up here, we were in recession. I guess we were headed into recession. But the first -- I show up -- Dick Cheney and I are here, we get sworn in, in late January, and the first quarter of '01 is recession, or the beginnings of a recession. And then the attacks hurt us, and we had corporate scandals. But I think the world is beginning to see America will deal with corporate scandals in a tough way. It doesn't matter whether you're -- we will hold people to account. I believe, in criminal matters, that there has to be consequences for bad behavior, and clear consequences, and that's how you deter bad behavior. And our SEC and our prosecutors are moving quickly.

The war affected people. But we're overcoming that. It's not only good tax policy, but we've got to work on making sure Congress doesn't overspend, and that's tough. But I'm holding the line. We've done pretty good on our budget agreements, so far. We need better legal policy. I've been pushing tort reform at the national level on class action suits. All of which make it easier for people to kind of calculate risk when it comes to employing capital, which is the essence of promoting the entrepreneurial spirit.

Trade is a very important element. I'll be dealing -- real quickly -- I'm going to take a good look at the steel issue. The International Trade Commission made a ruling. It said our industry was being harmed by imports. I felt I had an obligation to take that report seriously, which I did. I imposed tariffs to see whether or not, to give the -- breathing room for the industry to restructure. I'm not analyzing the extent to which they restructured. Having said that, I am a fierce free trader. I believe in free trade. I know free trade is important between America and Great Britain. And I will continue to resist any protectionist tendencies here. In order for us to be free traders, however, we've got to enforce the rules of free trade. And I was doing so through the International Trade Commission's report.

Sorry I cut you off.

Q Not at all.

THE PRESIDENT: First Lady Bush is standing out there. We're getting ready to award the National Humanities Award here.

Q Many thanks.

THE PRESIDENT: See you over there.

END 10:02 A.M. EST

Return to this article at:

Click to print this document