| The White House President George W. Bush |
Print this document |
For Immediate Release
Office of the Press Secretary
November 7, 2001
Wednesday's Homeland Security Briefing
Press Briefing by Homeland Security Director Tom Ridge
The James S. Brady Briefing Room
11:40 A.M. EST
GOVERNOR RIDGE: I thought I'd like to give you an update on homeland security
activities over the past several days, and then respond to your questions.
The President's directive was to coordinate a national homeland security
strategy and an integral part of that effort involves governors and local
officials. And we continue our outreach to those officials this week as we --
begun last week.
We've had a couple opportunities this week to talk to
Governor Hodges of South Carolina, Governor DiFrancesco of New
Jersey. We'll be meeting with Mayor Morial of New Orleans and five or six
of his colleagues. As you know, he chairs the League of Cities.
One of the other challenges that the Office of Homeland Security -- and it's a
wonderful challenge -- is to integrate all the Americans who want to help be
part of homeland security into a national strategy. And, to that end, this week
the National Organization on Disability visited the office.
Obviously, they've got some unique and very special challenges that we'd have to
deal with, but they also have some very unique and, I think, probably helpful
ideas and we want to integrate them in the process of developing a national
strategy.
I'll be meeting with the business executives of the Business Roundtable. Again,
the national strategy didn't say just a public sector strategy -- it involves
the private sector, so we've got to continue to work with our friends in the
private sector, as well.
NASCAR dropped by and said, what can we do to help. And, obviously,
they're involved in huge, outdoor public events. They've got ideas relative to
security. We think there will be ways that we could learn from them, and they
may learn a thing or two from us. But, again, it's just fusing all of these
groups and all of these Americans who want to help this President and help their
country. And we continue to find ways to integrate them into the development
and, ultimately, the implementation of both the short and long term homeland
strategy.
The first couple of weeks we've spent some time on the Hill. Today, I
concluded my fourth caucus visit. Last week I was going to try to hit the
House Democrats and the House Republicans on the same day. Former colleagues
from the House on the Democratic side kept me a little longer than we
anticipated, so we had to postpone that meeting to the Republicans. Today, we
concluded that this morning.
And, again, the international interest in supporting our effort -- not only in
Afghanistan, but here at home -- is reflected in the visit of the Ambassador
from Great Britain, Chris Meyer, who spent some time with me yesterday.
Again, this is a country that, unfortunately, has had real world experience with
political terrorism of different sorts. He brought some of the security people
in. We will be putting together a team to sit down with him and the other
members of our international coalition that are helping us in the war in the
Afghanistan. But they also, again, want to be participants and helpful in
addressing our homeland security needs, as well.
That reflects some of the activity of the Homeland Security Office. Finally, you
should know -- I think four post offices remain closed: Brentwood,
Trenton, the Stamp facility in Kansas City and the Pentagon sub-station. I
should note that the post office has received they estimate about 10,000 hoaxes
they've had to deal with, which has resulted in closing different post offices
for various periods of time.
They've investigated and to follow it up, and they've made 25 arrests. And,
obviously, the Postal Inspectors and the Department of Justice will move as
aggressively to bring them to the courtroom and to justice as quickly as
possible.
Q Do you think that the anthrax flow now has been stopped, really? Do you
have any better idea of the source? There seems to be some indication -- well,
the Pakistani letter turned out to be negative -- is that right -- do you think
it's more at home, the whole source?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: Well, I am hopeful, like the rest of America, that the anthrax
has stopped permanently. But there's nothing in --
Q Is there any --
GOVERNOR RIDGE: Well, we certainly haven't seen, nor detected, any other sources
of new anthrax. Obviously, we move systematically and aggressively to still deal
with the traces of the problem in Trenton and in Washington, D.C.
The investigation continues to preserve -- we haven't included or excluded
either a domestic or an international source for the anthrax. There have been
some suggestions that it could be domestic, but that has not been confirmed in
any manner, shape or form.
Q Can I follow on that, Governor? Because Barry Mawn, of the New York FBI is
quoted in today's Boston Globe as saying it was produced in the U.S. He
said, "It was made here." Is that incorrect?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: Well, he may have a suspicion that it was made here. But,
clearly, in talking with the FBI Director and other individuals involved in the
FBI, there is no credible evidence that points specifically, at least to date --
it may be his suspicion, his instinct; because, clearly, a microbiologist with
some sophisticated equipment that could be in this country or elsewhere, we
don't know each origin.
And so I would say, it may be his suspicion, but has been confirmed by the
investigation.
Q He also said he believed that an individual, rather than a group, is
responsible. He said the FBI suspects an individual rather than a group. Is that
your suspicion, as well?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: Well, it is -- we have not ruled out whether this was an act of
an individual or a collective act, whether it was a domestic source or foreign
source. And I think. hopefully, one of these days we'll be able to answer both
questions. Today, we cannot.
Q Can you tell us where we are in terms of the FBI, the threat that was
issued last week and the state of alert in the United States?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: We're still on alert. We're still on alert.
Q And for how long is that expected to continue?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: I think this heightened sense of awareness -- I mean, one of the
challenges is to take the legitimate anxiety and fear that Americans still have
and just -- we will be on alert indefinitely. And when we have specific
information from credible sources, we will appropriately give it to the law
enforcement community.
Q So there's no change in that status from last week?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: No change.
Q But the FBI was specific bout something happening, or -- alert over the next
couple of days. A couple of days has passed, nothing has happened, so is this
just sort of a general state of alert, indefinitely?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: I have talked to a variety of governors about this issue, and
many of them, even before that alert, had deployed initial state police, initial
national guard, they've really beefed up their security, not only around public
facilities, but have worked with the private sector to enhance security around
their facilities, as well.
I suspect that there will be an ebb and flow as governors who are on a
heightened state of alert, redeploy their resources. But for the time being, we
believe America should stay on alert.
Q Governor Ridge, one of the problems of anthrax seems to have been the
preliminary tests are taken; sometimes they're right, sometimes they come
back with the opposite -- positive negative. There seems to be two outfits
coming out with new tests. The Mayo Clinic is one, I think Walter Reed
is -- and another one. Is your office trying to get them? Because they also are
going to need government approval to be able to go out to the public. What are
you doing about it?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: You would be amazed at the number of -- they're not
solicitations, but inquiries we have received in the Office of Homeland Security
about the potential application of this or that technology. Clearly, not only
will we look to the private sector to help us identify some of the problems, but
also come up with some of the solutions.
So we are in the process of vetting out some of these recommendations. And
whether it's through the United States Army, through the Selective Service,
through the Office of Science and Technology, there is enough expertise within
the federal government to take a look at these things. And if they appear to
provide a commercial solution, a quick turnaround that has application to our
environment, then we follow it up.
Q Is it feasible this stage? Does it seem feasible --
GOVERNOR RIDGE: I'm not in a position to make a technical judgment, but we want
to explore all potential ideas and suggestions, particularly when they seem to
be further along in terms of research and development.
Q You mentioned that you had talked to officials in South Carolina, New Jersey
and New Orleans. What's your assessment right now of security at U.S. port
facilities? How much cargo is actually being screened, and what prospect is
there for actually securing the amount of cargo that comes into the United
States?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: The Coast Guard, Customs officials, everybody that had a remote
connection or a direct connection with maritime security has really ramped up
all their assets and, frankly, probably deflected some assets that were involved
in other areas to provide the highest possible state of security.
One of the things that has happened, again, that's very, very reassuring, that
there has been tremendous integration, and many examples -- and Governor Hodges'
provided me one, where some of the facilities are publicly owned by the state,
others are federal facilities, and they've integrated their resources.
So, again, it is a point of vulnerability because of international commerce.
These are our eyes on the world, windows on the -- as it were. The opportunity
for us to move in and out of our commerce, hundreds of billions of dollars worth
of commerce, so we take that security, enhanced security. But we're looking
continually, day by day, for ways to improve it.
Frankly, I think one of the things they have done to enhance security, they're
inspecting more of the cargo than they've ever done before. They've identified
ships that they're bordering out in the sea. Instead of giving 24 hour notice
with regard to cargo and crew, they're giving 96 hour notice, so they can match
the crew with any list that they may have generated.
So they've heightened security, they've integrated a lot of their resources with
local and state resources. And they've tried to move the perimeter outside the
ports as part of the enhanced security.
Q Can I go back to John's question? When you issued the threat, initially, last
week, you indicated that there was specific intelligence that an attack might
be imminent. You say we're on an alert indefinitely. But are we still
getting that type of intelligence information?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: Well, the alert, as I recall, as you recall, last week from
multiple sources deemed credible over a specific period of time. Obviously, that
frame of reference, the calendar has passed, but we ask people to stay on that
same heightened sense of alert.
Q But I'm not asking you about the alert, I'm asking about the intelligence. Are
we getting the same kind of indications that an attack might be imminent?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: We get threat reports on a daily basis, and the challenge and
one of the most difficult challenges within the intelligence community is to
assess these reports and to assess the credibility and to go back and, if
possible, interrogate the sources of these reports. We get them every day. And
for that reason, we keep everybody at a heightened state of alert.
Q I know you get them every day, but I'm wondering if the intelligence that
you're getting now is similar to the intelligence you got before, which said
that an attack might be imminent?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: The intelligence that we get every day suggests that an attack
or attacks could be imminent. But there has been no suggestion of specific venue
or weapon of terror that might be employed.
Q The FBI counterterrorism chief testified on the Hill that they did not know
how many labs produced anthrax. You, this morning, said on the Hill there
were 80 to 90. Can you explain, did you guys find that out overnight? Did he
just not know? Can you explain why you know and he didn't know?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: The reason I knew -- and I don't know it to be true, absolutely
-- but I saw it was referenced during that committee hearing. And we know there
are several dozen university laboratories and pharmaceutical laboratories and
there are several dozen laboratories out there that have access to the anthrax
strain.
The FBI and the Department of Justice have been in the process of talking to
individuals associated with those laboratories to follow up and determine if
there is any leads, any information they can glean from the people who are
participating in that research. I cannot tell you whether they have exhausted
the list and they have contacted everybody they want to talk with.
They're clearly aware of the list, they're aware of the facilities, they're
aware they've got the need. So it is a part of an ongoing, daily, intense
investigation as they follow up leads on anthrax, follow up leads on the New
York tragedy, follow up leads on the hoaxes that they have to take as a serious
-- potential serious threat. So you've got the law enforcement community totally
engaged in a variety of different investigations, some of which, unfortunately,
lead them down a false path.
One final question.
Q On the tests, a few days ago there was an apparently inaccurate report that
bentonite was the binding agent in the anthrax that was tested from the Daschle
letter. I assume we now know what the binding agent was. And can you tell us
what that suggests about the source of the anthrax?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: There were accounts of reports that said bentonite was the
binding agent; none of those reports ever came across my desk. The reports that
came across my desk suggested that they were looking to see if that was a
component of the anthrax. And we concluded without internal investigation that
it was not.
Q What was the binding agent?
GOVERNOR RIDGE: The ingredient that we talked about before was silicon. But
there's no additional information with regard to additional characteristics that
have come across in any of the additional tests that we've conducted since that
time.
Thank you.
END 11:57 A.M. EST